![]() |
|
GLOBAL UMMAH SOLIDARITY - Printable Version +- Forums (https://www.globalvision2000.com/forum) +-- Forum: Think Tanks (https://www.globalvision2000.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Think Tanks (Rest of the world) (https://www.globalvision2000.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=16) +--- Thread: GLOBAL UMMAH SOLIDARITY (/showthread.php?tid=59) |
RE: GLOBAL UMMAH SOLIDARITY - globalvision2000administrator - 12-04-2025 THIS TURKISH VIDEO IS AUTODUBBED INTO ENGLISH. A FORMER TURKISH ADMIRAL SEEKS CLARITY ON THE PAPAL VISIT TO TURKIYE AND LEBANON. HE ARGUES THE PAPAL VISIT WAS TREATED WITH A HEAD OF STATE PROTOCOL NOT RELIGIOUS LEADER PROTOCOL AS THE POPE IS HEAD OF THE VATICAN CITY STATE. HE HAS NO ISSUE WITH THAT. BUT HE QUESTIONS THE EXACT TIMING AND IT'S SIGNIFICANCE WITH ANOTHER NOVEMBER 28 IN 1095. PEOPLE WILL BE SCRATCHING THEIR HEADS ON THAT DATE. THEY SHOULD DO THEIR RESEARCH AS THEY WILL FIND IT WAS THE DATE FOR THE START OF THE CRUSADES. HE QUESTIONS WHY THE AMERICAN POPE DID NOT VISIT GAZA WEST BANK OR JERUSALEM? I AM SURPRISED THAT NO ONE HAS DEBATED THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS VISIT AS ONLY THE TRUTH CAN SET YOU FREE. [/url] RE: GLOBAL UMMAH SOLIDARITY - globalvision2000administrator - 12-06-2025 RE: GLOBAL UMMAH SOLIDARITY - globalvision2000administrator - 12-18-2025 NO REAL CEASEFIRE IN GAZA AS ISRAEL MOVES TO BAN AID GROUPS https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2025/12/31/live-israels-ban-on-aid-organisations-in-gaza?update=4206997 RE: GLOBAL UMMAH SOLIDARITY - globalvision2000administrator - 12-24-2025 THIS PARTICULAR KEYNOTE PRESENTATION IS IMPORTANT BUT WAS SUBJECT TO WHAT CAN ONLY BE DESCRIBED AS AN UNEXPLAINED CYBERATTACK WITH ORGANISERS TRYING TO RESOLVE IT. BUT FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST IT IS BEING SHOWN. TRANSHUMANISM AND CHRISTIAN ZIONISM: TWO SIDES OF THE SAME HERESY Matt Ehret 11th Global Vision 2000 Conference Why did a radical atheist Darwinian Sir Julian Huxley find a common ally in Jesuit priest Pierre Teilhard de Chardin in co-founding a new religion known as Transhumanism? Why have Christian Zionist Neocons emerged into such a direct collaboration in our modern day alongside Silicon Valley transhumanists with names such as Peter Thiel, Curtis Yarvin, Elon Musk and Larry Ellison? Why have radical anti-semitic imperialists been at the forefront of the creation of the Balfour Accords and the formulation of Zionism and is it truly a paradox or is there a simple reason explaining this? At the 11th Global Vision 2000 Eschatology Conference, Matt Ehret was asked to deliver the keynote address to showcase the dual twins of Christian Zionism (from its Templar-Jesuit-Rosicrucian roots) and Transhumanism (from its Templar Jesuit Rosicrucian roots) as two sides of the same eschatological heresy. The common thread of Eugenics, Darwinism as a pseudo scientific framework justifying global empire, and a false eschatology shaping a belief that a 'new age' can only emerge under the context of a restoration of the Templar-run Kingdom of Jerusalem, mass purgative violence, and a new high priesthood. Watch other presentations from the conference here: https://www.radio4all.net/files/tony@cultureshop.org.uk COMPLETE%2011th%20Global%20Vision%202000%20Eschatology%20Conference%2014Dec2025%20(15%20sections).mp3 11th Global Vision 2000 Eschatology Conference 14Dec2025 (15 sections) ? 00:06:30 GAZA, ESCHATOLOGY AND THE CRISIS OF GLOBAL CONSCIENCE: GLOBAL VISION 2000 AND THE MORAL ECONOMY OF PEACE https://theislamiceconomist.org/politics/gaza-eschatology-and-the-crisis-of-global-conscience-global-vision-2000-and-the-moral-economy-of-peace/ By our Special Correspondent On 14 December, as Gaza burned under relentless bombardment and the international system revealed its profound moral paralysis, scholars, faith leaders, economists, and political thinkers gathered virtually for the 12th Global Vision 2000 Eschatology Conference. What emerged over many hours of intense discussion was not a conventional academic symposium, but a searching interrogation of the ethical foundations of the modern world order.
The conference situated Gaza—and parallel conflicts such as Kashmir—not as isolated geopolitical crises, but as symptoms of a deeper civilizational failure: the collapse of moral restraint in a global political economy driven by power, profit, and ideological absolutism. The proceedings offered a sobering reminder that economics, theology, and politics can no longer be treated as separate domains.
Interfaith Dialogue in an Age of Fracture
The conference opened with interfaith prayers led by Christian and Muslim participants, setting an intentional tone of moral solidarity. Moeen Yaseen of Global Vision 2000 introduced the gathering as part of a long-running effort to foster serious interreligious engagement on eschatology, justice, and global responsibility. He revisited the idea of the “New Abrahamic Accords”—not as diplomatic normalization, but as a shared ethical framework rooted in the Abrahamic tradition’s commitment to justice, human dignity, and peace.
Participants joined from Europe, the Middle East, Africa, South Asia, and North America, reflecting the transnational nature of the crises under discussion. Despite technical disruptions and absent speakers, the urgency of the moment sustained the dialogue.
Gaza and the Bankruptcy of International Order Gaza dominated the moral horizon of the conference. Moeen Yaseen described the war as a historic failure of the so-called rules-based international order, arguing that international law, humanitarian norms, and multilateral institutions have been rendered hollow by selective enforcement and political hypocrisy.
A message delivered by Ahmet Samet on behalf of Hassan Turan of the Turkish Parliament reinforced this assessment. The statement called for a human-centered approach to Gaza, grounded in structural justice rather than rhetorical condemnation. The crisis, speakers agreed, exposes not only Western complicity but also the inadequacy of Muslim political leadership, which has largely failed to translate popular outrage into coordinated action.
Terrorism, State Violence, and the Rewriting of Definitions Dr. James Thring offered a rigorous legal and historical analysis of Palestine, challenging narrow and politicized definitions of terrorism. He argued that state violence designed to intimidate, displace, or collectively punish civilian populations must be recognized as terrorism under any coherent moral framework.
Tracing Zionist militancy back to armed groups of the early 20th century, Dr. Thring highlighted how power, lobbying, and narrative control have shaped global perceptions of Israel–Palestine. His intervention underscored a key theme of the conference: that moral language itself has been captured and inverted by dominant powers.
Zionism, Colonialism, and Historical Memory
Several speakers insisted that the Palestinian question cannot be understood as a religious conflict. Professor Haim Zabner contrasted the present catastrophe in Gaza with the historical coexistence of Muslims, Jews, and Christians in Al-Andalus, arguing that Palestine represents a colonial project rather than a theological struggle.
Professor Olsi extended this analysis through a sweeping historical account linking European colonialism, the decline of the Ottoman Empire, and the emergence of Israel. While some of his claims were contested, his contribution reflected a broader concern shared by participants: that modern Middle Eastern conflicts are inseparable from imperial finance, geopolitical engineering, and the legacy of Western domination.
Jewish Anti-Zionism and Ethical Witness
One of the most significant interfaith contributions came from Rabbi Dovid Feldman of Neturei Karta. Speaking as a religious Jew opposed to Zionism, Rabbi Feldman rejected the conflation of Judaism with the Israeli state, arguing that Zionism violates core Jewish teachings and instrumentalizes Jewish suffering.
He emphasized that the Holocaust must never be used to justify new atrocities and that genuine Jewish safety cannot be achieved through occupation and violence. His testimony disrupted dominant media narratives and reinforced the conference’s insistence on moral clarity over identity politics.
Kashmir and Palestine: Parallel Injustices The conference widened its lens to South Asia through a focused discussion on Kashmir. Dr. Mubeen Ahmad Shah of the Kashmir Diaspora Coalition and Professor Imtiaz Khan of George Washington University outlined the legal and humanitarian dimensions of India’s occupation of Kashmir, drawing explicit parallels with Palestine. Both conflicts, speakers argued, reflect the same global pattern: the normalization of occupation, demographic engineering, and repression under the cover of security discourse. Education, international pressure, and cross-border intellectual dialogue were identified as essential tools for resistance.
Transhumanism, Technocracy, and the Future of Humanity
Beyond immediate conflicts, the conference addressed emerging ideological threats. Matt’s presentation on transhumanism and Christian Zionism traced their roots to technocracy and early eugenic thought, warning that technological utopianism may deepen inequality and erode human dignity.
This discussion resonated strongly with concerns about the global political economy. Participants questioned whether artificial intelligence, digital currencies, and elite-driven “reset” agendas represent progress—or a new phase of control divorced from ethical accountability.
Eschatology, Peace Intelligence, and Global Governance
Dr. Thomas Daffern introduced the concept of “peace intelligence,” calling for a synthesis of scientific reason, ethical wisdom, and spiritual insight. Rejecting violent ethno-nationalism and apocalyptic fatalism, he proposed an interfaith peace treaty and even the creation of a European Peace Agency dedicated to conflict mediation and non-violence.
The proposal reflected a recurring conviction: that humanity possesses the intellectual and moral resources to choose cooperation over catastrophe, but lacks the institutional courage to do so.
Conclusion: Economics After Gaza
What ultimately distinguished the 12th Global Vision 2000 Eschatology Conference was its refusal to isolate Gaza, Kashmir, or global instability from the structures that finance, enable, and normalize them. The discussions converged on a stark diagnosis: the contemporary global political economy has become morally unmoored, capable of absorbing genocide, occupation, and mass dispossession as manageable externalities.
From an economic perspective, Gaza exposes the fiction of neutrality. Capital flows, arms markets, reconstruction contracts, sanctions regimes, and debt structures are not passive mechanisms; they are active instruments of power. When international financial institutions remain silent, when arms manufacturers post record profits, and when supply chains continue uninterrupted amid mass civilian death, economics itself becomes complicit.
The language of growth, stability, and innovation rings hollow when it coexists with the systematic destruction of human life. A political economy that rewards military-industrial expansion while criminalizing humanitarian resistance has crossed a civilizational threshold. Finance without justice becomes extraction. Markets without ethics become tools of coercion. Technology without moral restraint becomes an accelerant of violence.
For Muslim societies—and for all those concerned with ethical economics—the implications are profound. Zakat, waqf, risk-sharing finance, and prohibition of exploitation were never merely religious formalities; they were designed to discipline power and protect human dignity. The modern global system, by contrast, externalizes suffering while privatizing gain. Gaza reveals this contradiction with unbearable clarity.
The conference did not offer technocratic fixes, but it did insist on first principles. Any credible post-Gaza economic order must confront arms financing, impose accountability on corporations and banks, challenge sanctions hypocrisy, and reorient development away from elite accumulation toward human security. Reconstruction without justice, speakers warned, risks becoming another cycle of extraction.
Eschatology, in this context, functioned less as speculation about the end of time than as a moral audit of the present. The real question posed by Global Vision 2000 was not when the world will end, but whether the current economic order deserves to continue unchanged.
Gaza stands as an indictment of an economy that has learned to price everything except human life. The choice before the global community is therefore not abstract or theological, but material and immediate: either economics is re-embedded within ethics, or it will remain an efficient manager of permanent crisis. In that choice lies the true meaning of justice, peace, and any future worthy of being saved.THE 11TH GLOBAL VISION 2000 ESCHATOLOGY CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD ON SUNDAY DECEMBER 14 2025- 23 JUMADA AL THANI 1447 FOCUSSING ON THE ESCHATOLOGIES OF PEACE AND JUSTICE IN AN AGE OF GENOCIDE AND THE GREAT RESET . GLOBAL VISION 2000 WILL HOLD THIS IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE FOLLOWING ORGANISATIONS:- AFRICA ISLAMIC ECONOMIC FOUNDATION AFRICA PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT NETWORK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PEACE STUDIES AND GLOBAL PHILOSOPHY AGENDA SESSION 1 0830 UK time /1130 Turkiye time Zoom Registration 0900 Uk time/ 1200 Turkiye time. INTRODUCTION Abrahamic Accords Prayers Baba Yunus Canon Peter Challen Canon Perminus Muir Rabbi Dovid Feldman Setting the scene Moeen Yaseen Global Vision 2000 Opening Speech Hasan Turan Grand National Assembly of Turkiye Turkiye-Palestine Interparliamentary Friendship Group SESSION 1 ESCHATOLOGY OF PEACE AND JUSTICE IN THE HOLY LAND AND WORLD Transhumanism and Millenarian Christian Zionism: Two sides of the same heresy Matthew Ehret Rising Tide Foundation Messianic Zionist Ideology from Jabotinsky-Netanyahu Dr.Olsi Jazexhiu International Islamic University of Malaysia Post genocide : A Decolonised secular democratic state in Palestine based on the Andalusian Convivencia Professor Haim Zabner SOAS associate The Terrorist Sect in Palestine Dr.James Thring Ministry of Peace Towards an interfaith eschatology of peace: Solomon Option Dr.Thomas Daffern International Institute of Peace Studies and Global Philosophy Q & A SESSION SESSION 2 THE DAY AFTER. PANEL SESSION ON FILISTEEN AND KASHMIR Rabbi Dovid Feldman Neturei Karta International Fra Hughes Palestine Aid Ireland Dr.Mubeen Shah Kashmir Diaspora Coalition Q & A SESSION SESSION 3 ESCHATOLOGY OF PEACE AND JUSTICE AND THE GLOBAL RESET Return of the gunpowder mind of Western civilisation & the looming shadow of WW3 Baba Yunus Africa Islamic Economic Foundation The Great Plan, Great War and Great Defeat Tony Gosling The Global political economy and the Global reset Dr.Simon Mouatt Christian Council of Monetary Justice The Hindutva Zionism Alliance, Kashmir, Indian Muslims and Pakistan Professor Dr.Imtiaz Khan World Kashmir Awareness PRESS RELEASE December 13 2025 THE GLOBAL VISION 2000 THINKTANK IS HOLDING IT'S 11th ESCHATOLOGY CONFERENCE ON THE ESCHATOLOGIES OF PEACE AND JUSTICE IN AN AGE OF GENOCIDE AND THE GLOBAL RESET ON SUNDAY DECEMBER 14 2025- JUMADA AL THANI 23 1447. THIS CONFERENCE FOLLOWS THE HORRENDOUS GENOCIDAL GAZA WAR AND ONGOING ISRAELI EXPANSIONISM TO CREATE A GREATER ISRAEL. IT ALSO COINCIDES WITH THE STORM OF THE GLOBAL RESET AND AB ORDO CHAO. AT A TIME WHEN THE SUN IS SETTING IN THE WEST AND RISING FROM EAST. AS THE WORLD IS IN A STATE OF TRANSITION MOVING FROM AN UNIPOLAR TO MULTIPOLAR WORLD IT IS TIME FOR GLOBAL ISLAM TO RISE AND SHINE IN THIS DARK ERA. AS THERE IS STILL WAR AND EXTREME VOLATILITY IN BOTH UKRAINE AND THE HOLY LAND IT IS PULLING IN REGIONAL MILITARY POWERS. WE CAN STATE THAT WE HAVE ENTERED THE START OF REGIONAL WARS WHICH ARE DRAGGING IN WORLD POWERS. THIS DANGEROUS ESCALATION IS HEIGHTENING FEARS OF WW3. THIS ONLY MAKES IT VITALLY IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND AND PREPARE AT ALL LEVELS TO EFFECTIVELY NAVIGATE THESE TIMES. THE TREACHEROUS PATH THE WORLD IS NOW ON DOES NOT BODE WELL FOR 2026 . IT IS CLEAR THAT THESE TWO GLOBAL CRISES WILL DOMINATE THE WORLD AT LEAST FOR SEVERAL YEARS. AS WE ALSO HAVE THE END OF THE WESTERN MONETARY ERA . THE CONFERENCE IS MARKED BY HAVING AN INTERFAITH DIMENSION TO THE DISCUSSIONS ON ESCHATOLOGY. LEADING JEWISH, CHRISTIAN AND MUSLIM SCHOLARS, THINKERS AND JOURNALISTS WILL BE CHARTING OUT NEW PERSPECTIVES ON A VERY TURBULENT ERA. IT WILL BE STARTED WITH THE NEW ABRAHAMIC ACCORDS PRAYERS. THERE WILL BE EXPERTS SPEAKING ON JEWISH, CHRISTIAN AND ISLAMIC ESCHATOLOGIES AND GEO POLITICS. THERE WILL BE A FOCUS ON THE HOLY LAND IN THE LEVANT AS WELL AS KASHMIR AND THE INDIAN SUB CONTINENT. THERE WILL BE A FOCUS ON POST HUMANISM AND TECHNO FEUDALISM. THE ATTEMPTED HIJACKING OF RELIGIONS AS WELL AS UNDERSTANDING WHAT WILL COME AFTER THE COLLAPSE OF A DYING CAPITALIST SYSTEM AND MONETARY SYSTEM. HASAN TURAN THE QUAESTOR OF THE GRAND NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF TURKIYE AND CHAIRPERSON OF THE TURKIYE-PALESTINE INTERPARLIAMENTARY FRIENDSHIP GROUP WILL GIVE THE OPENING SPEECH. MOEEN YASEEN DIRECTOR OF GLOBAL VISION 2000 STATED, " THIS YEAR'S ESCHATOLOGY CONFERENCE IS TAKING PLACE AT AN APOCALYPTIC TIME OF WAR AND TRANSITION. WE ARE FOCUSSING ON THE WORLD'S TURNING POINT IN THE HOLY LANDS AND WE SEEK TO CLARIFY THE ABRAHAMIC ESCHATOLOGIES AND GEO-POLITICAL REALITIES ON THE GROUND". END RE: GLOBAL UMMAH SOLIDARITY - globalvision2000administrator - 01-02-2026 PAX JUDAICA AI SURVEILLANCE AND THE JEWISH EMPIRE WHY IS ISRAEL SPLITTING IN TWO? Historian Ilan Pappé Explains the Internal War Nobody Talks About Venezuela Regime Change, Maduro Kidnapped by US, 03Jan26 Rolling News Coverage Tony Gosling Press TV INDIA's CHENAB DAM PLAN RILES ECO-ACTIVISTS, PAKISTAN ALIKE https://www.dawn.com/news/1964051/indias-chenab-dam-plan-riles-eco-activists-pakistan-alike PAKISTAN 7 OTHER MUSLIM MAJORITY NATIONS EXPRESS DEEPEST CONCERN OVER DETERIORATING HUMANITARIAN CONDITIONS IN GAZA https://www.dawn.com/news/1964671/pakistan-7-other-muslim-majority-nations-express-deepest-concern-over-deteriorating-humanitarian-conditions This newsletter informs about recent and upcoming activities of Civil Society Organizations working on the question of Palestine. The Committee and the Division for Palestinian Rights of the UN Secretariat provide the information “as is” without warranty of any kind, and do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in the websites linked in the newsletter. https://www.un.org/unispal/document/ngo-action-news-2-january-2026 Middle East
Africa, Asia and Europe
North America
United Nations
Document Type: NGO Action News Document Sources: ADALAH - Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel, Addameer Prisoners’ Support and Human Rights Association, Al Mezan Centre for Human Rights, Al-Haq, Amnesty International, B'Tselem, Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People (CEIRPP), Division for Palestinian Rights (DPR), Foundation for Middle East Peace (FMEP), Medecins sans Frontieres, Middle East Institute, Oxfam, Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, Peace Now, Yesh Din (NGO) Subject: Gaza Strip, NGOs/Civil Society, UNRWA Publication Date: 02/01/2026 RE: GLOBAL UMMAH SOLIDARITY - globalvision2000administrator - 01-10-2026 RE: GLOBAL UMMAH SOLIDARITY - globalvision2000administrator - 01-15-2026 RAJAB IS ONE OF THE 4 SACRED MONTHS OF THE ISLAMIC LUNAR CALENDAR. RAJAB 27 IS THE MOST IMPORTANT NIGHT IN COSMIC SPIRITUAL HISTORY AS IT IS THE NIGHT WHICH CONNECTS THE HEAVENS AND EARTH VIA THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD PBUH. WE NEED TO USE THIS SACRED NIGHT FOR SPIRITUAL TRAINING FOR THE COMING STORM THIS YEAR AS MANY MAYBE BLOWN AWAY WITH THE GATHERING FITNAS- TRIALS AND TRIBULATIONS. THE DAJALLIC FORCES HAVE MADE IT CLEAR THAT THIS YEAR IS WHEN THEY CHANGE GEARS TO MATERIALISE AB ORDO CHAO. IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THIS IS DON'T WORRY AS YOU WILL SEE IT ALL AROUND YOU. IF YOUR KEEN PAY HEED TO THE GATHERING OF THE DEVILS IN DAVOS NEXT WEEK. I DON'T WANT TO SPEND TIME AND ENERGY ON THE DOOMSDAY ACCELERATIONISTS BUT ON MATERIALISING ISLAMIC SPIRITUALITY. AL ISRA WAL MIRAJ IS THE NIGHT IN WHICH THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD PBUH EMBARKED ON THE FAMOUS NIGHT JOURNEY ON THE BURAQ. IT WAS A LIVING MIRACLE WHEN HE TRAVELLED FROM MASJID AL HARAM IN MAKKAH TO MASJID AL AQSA IN JERUSALEM ALL IN ONE NIGHT. THE SECOND PART WAS THE ASCENSION FROM MASJID AL AQSA TO THE HEAVENS TO MEET THE CREATOR. THIS MEANS THAT JERUSALEM IS THE COSMIC SPIRITUAL CENTRE. JERUSALEM IS CENTRE STAGE BETWEEN THE HEAVENS AND EARTH. JERUSALEM AND AQSA SPECIFICALLY WAS THE MEETING PLACE WHERE THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD PBUH LED ALL THE PROPHETS IN PRAYER. IT WAS WHERE HE LED ABRAHAM, MOSES AND JESUS PBUT IN PRAYER CONFIRMING HIS SEAL OF PROPHETHOOD. IT CONFIRMED JERUSALEM AS THE FIRST QIBLA OF ISLAM. SO ISLAM, PROPHETHOOD, JERUSALEM AND COSMOS IS INTERTWINED. IT IS NOT ANOTHER CITY AND THE MOSQUE IS NOT JUST ANOTHER MOSQUE. FURTHERMORE THE RETURN WAS COMPLETED WITH THE SPIRITUAL GIFT TO HUMANITY OF THE PRAYERS WHICH ARE TO BE OFFERED FIVE TIMES DAILY TO ALLAH SWT WITHOUT ANY INTERMEDIARIES. THIS WAS A SPIRITUAL REVOLUTION WHICH IS UNPRECEDENTED AND UNSTOPPABLE. YET SUCH A BLESSED LOCATION IS DESECRATED DURING A HORRIFIC GENOCIDAL WAR IN THE HOLY LAND IN GAZA, WEST BANK AND JERUSALEM WHICH IS BEYOND WORDS AND CARRIED OUT BY MODERN DAY BARBARIANS. THESE SACRED LANDS ARE BEING TRAMPLED UNDER THE FEET OF 2 DAJALLIC EMPIRES- ISRAHELL A RISING PAX JUDAICA AND DYING PAX AMERICANA. GLOBAL ISLAM MUST NOT LOOK THE OTHER WAY AND BETRAY QUDS. WE MUST RESPOND TO THE DEFENCE LESS AND OPPRESSED OTHERWISE OUR SALVATION WILL BECOME A BURDEN TOO HEAVY TO CARRY. WE MUST SHOW WE ARE MEN NOT MICE. WE NEED TO ACCOUNT ON OUR ABSENCE IN THE STRUGGLE TO LIBERATE QUDS AND FILISTEEN. SO WHERE IS THE ISLAMIC DEFENCE FORCE AND WHERE IS THE COMMANDER THE AMEER AL MOMINEEN - THE KHALIFA? THIS SHOULD BE THE TALK EVERYWHERE AS QUDS WEEPS WITH 108 YEARS OF OCCUPATION SINCE 1917. ALSO WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT THE TAKE OVER OF DELHI SINCE 1947 AND THE BARBARIC DEMOLITION OF THE BABRI MASJID IN 1992? ARE WE GOING TO ACCEPT THESE AS FAIT ACCOMPLI AND AS WATER UNDER THE BRIDGE? GLOBAL ISLAM'S GEN Z NEED TO UNDERSTAND THIS IS NOT PARTY TIME. TONIGHT IS WHEN WE WAKE UP TO COMMEMORATE SURA ISRA. TONIGHT IS WHEN WE COMMIT TO MAKE THE CHANGE AND BETHECHANGE. TONIGHT IS WHEN WE RISE AND MARCH TOWARDS THE LIGHT IN THE DARK TUNNEL. THIS YEAR AND AT THIS TIME OF OUR YEAR IS THE TIME TO BE AWAKENED TO THE AZAN OF OUR TIMES AS A NEW STORM BLOWS OVER THE ENTIRE REGION. BE THERE OR BE SQUARED. HASBUNALLAH In cities across Iran in recent days, millions of people have marched in support of their government and to protest violence and disorder that Israel’s Mossad has boasted about supporting – in the latest Western push for regime change. On Wednesday, enormous crowds turned out again in the capital Tehran, for a mass funeral of some 100 police and security officers killed in attacks by foreign-backed insurgents. Western media and politicians paint a totally opposite picture, portraying a regime in crisis, wantonly killing its own people to crush a mass uprising seeking its overthrow. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump is escalating his threats of renewed US military attacks on Iran, raising the risk of another US-Israeli-instigated regional war. And while Western governments pretend to be concerned for Iran’s people, they continue to aid and abet Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza. What is happening in Iran? How does it relate to Palestine and broader global developments and how does Western propaganda aim to prepare public opinion for another intervention aimed at imposing total American-Israeli hegemony? Can Iran face off against this hybrid war of sanctions, massive disinformation, covert action and military threats? To discuss these questions, we will speak to Mohammad Marandi, political analyst and professor of comparative literature at the University of Tehran. We’ll start the program with the news from Nora Barrows-Friedman. Later, Jon Elmer will report on the Qassam Brigades’ first official release of names of their fallen soldiers, revealing for the first time their role in the battle in Gaza and the combat videos they produced. RE: GLOBAL UMMAH SOLIDARITY - globalvision2000administrator - 01-23-2026 GAZA IS NOT FOR SALE : DAVOS, TRUMP’s BOARD OF PEACE AND PORNOGRAPHY OF IMPERIAL POWER https://theislamiceconomist.org/editorial/gaza-is-not-for-sale-trumps-board-of-peace-in-davos-and-the-privatization-of-justice GAZA AND THE LONG WAR ON A PEOPLE : WHY TRUMP’s BOARD OF PEACE CANNOT DELIVER JUSTICE https://theislamiceconomist.org/politics/gaza-and-the-long-war-on-a-people-why-trumps-board-of-peace-cannot-deliver-justice/ ‘IMPERIAL’ AGENDA : WHAT’s TRUMP’s GAZA DEVELOPMENT PLAN, UNVEILED IN DAVOS ? The plan promises coastal tourism, free trade, skyscrapers and jobs. But the people of Gaza have not been consulted https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/1/23/imperial-agenda-whats-trumps-gaza-development-plan-unveiled-in-davos [/url] WHO SPEAKS FOR THE OPPRESSED ? https://theislamiceconomist.org/politics/who-speaks-for-the-oppressed/ Why do some injustices dominate global headlines while others are softened, distorted, or quietly ignored? From Palestine and Venezuela to Iran and beyond, patterns of selective outrage reveal a deeper crisis—not of information, but of narrative power. Baba Yunus Muhammad examines how global media structures shape moral perception, why independent Muslim and Global South media platforms collapsed in the West, and what the resulting silence means for the oppressed in a world where power increasingly determines truth.
Injustice in the modern world is neither hidden nor undocumented. It is broadcast live, archived endlessly, and debated across platforms. Yet while some injustices are elevated into global emergencies, others—often deeper, longer, and more devastating—are rendered routine, peripheral, or morally ambiguous. This disparity is not accidental. It is the product of media power: who controls it, whose narratives it amplifies, and whose suffering it normalizes.
From Palestine to Venezuela, from Iran to other non-Western-aligned societies, a familiar pattern repeats itself. When crises unfold outside the Western political orbit, their causes are simplified, their histories compressed, and their victims filtered through language that subtly redistributes blame. Occupation becomes “conflict.” Economic warfare becomes “mismanagement.” Protest violence is magnified; the violence of sanctions, siege, and diplomatic strangulation fades into the background.
Nowhere is this clearer than in Palestine. Few injustices are as thoroughly documented and yet as persistently distorted. Decades of military occupation, blockade, settlement expansion, and civilian casualties are routinely framed as a symmetrical dispute between equal sides. Palestinian suffering is collectivized and anonymized; Israeli suffering is individualized and moralized. Language performs what weapons and checkpoints enforce: it reshapes perception until structural oppression appears as an endless cycle of unfortunate events.
Venezuela tells a similar story. Its economic collapse is almost universally attributed to domestic authoritarianism, with little sustained attention paid to the cumulative impact of sanctions, financial isolation, and external pressure. The humanitarian consequences are acknowledged, but responsibility is carefully displaced. The instruments of coercion disappear from view, while their effects remain permanently visible.
Iran, too, has been subjected to this selective moral gaze. Internal unrest is presented as definitive proof of illegitimacy, while the context of sanctions, covert pressure, and economic siege is treated as incidental. When protests turned violent, coverage focused almost exclusively on civilian casualties, largely ignoring officially acknowledged reports of widespread destruction of public infrastructure: mosques, prayer halls, hospitals, ambulances, fire service vehicles, and emergency facilities. Even the deaths of police officers and security personnel—events that would provoke national trauma and sweeping security measures in Western states—were marginalized, as though such lives carried no ethical weight.
This is not an argument in defence of any government. It is an argument against double standards. In Western capitals, the killing of security personnel during unrest is a red line. It justifies emergency laws, mass arrests, and extraordinary force. Elsewhere, the same reality is quietly erased to preserve a preferred narrative. Some states are granted the right to defend themselves; others are denied even the right to context.
This asymmetry is reinforced by the global posture of the United States. A country that has directly or indirectly attacked Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan, and exerted coercive pressure on Venezuela continues to present itself as the custodian of international order. Meanwhile, states that have not invaded others in modern history are branded existential threats, their leaders openly discussed in terms of “regime decapitation.” When senior American figures publicly dismiss international law as a constraint on their actions, relying instead on personal morality, the issue ceases to be hypocrisy alone. It becomes the normalization of power without accountability.
This order is sustained not only by military and economic dominance, but by media consensus. And here lies the quieter tragedy: the collapse of alternative media ecosystems capable of challenging dominant narratives with consistency and credibility.
There was a period when Muslim and Global South perspectives found serious expression in the West through intellectually grounded publications. Titles such as Araby (also known as Arabia), Afkar Inquiry, Impact International, and Crescent International sought to analyses global affairs beyond imperial assumptions and ideological conformity. They were not propaganda sheets. They were forums for debate, critique, and principled dissent.
Their fates, however, reveal the structural fragility of alternative media when it is built around personalities rather than institutions. Araby, a London-based publication that once enjoyed wide readership and influence, collapsed abruptly after its principal financial patron, Saudi oil minister Zaki Yamani, was removed from power. With his fall went the publication’s financial lifeline, exposing the fatal vulnerability of media dependent on political patronage rather than institutional endowment.
Afkar Inquiry, another London venture, followed a slower but equally instructive path. Despite its intellectual ambition, it struggled under the weight of high production costs, limited circulation, and the absence of sustained backing. Operating in a hostile media environment, it eventually ceased publication—not because it lacked ideas, but because ideas alone could not sustain professional journalism.
Impact International, launched in London around the same period and often mentioned alongside Crescent International, survived longer but ultimately folded in 2013. Its closure reflected the cumulative pressures facing independent Muslim media in the West: shrinking revenues, rising costs, and a rapidly changing media ecosystem dominated by digital platforms it could not fully adapt to or compete with.
Crescent International stands as the exception that proves the rule. Founded in the early 1970s, it endured where others fell, largely because it maintained low overheads, avoided dependence on a single political patron, and accepted marginality rather than compromise. Yet its survival has been one of endurance, not expansion. It persisted through sacrifice and ideological commitment, not through the kind of institutional investment that allows media organizations to scale, professionalize, and shape global discourse.
Taken together, these trajectories tell a sobering story. Muslim and Global South media did not collapse because their analysis was flawed or their audiences indifferent. They collapsed because truth without infrastructure is fragile, because reliance on individual benefactors creates fatal exposure to political change, and because media was never treated as strategic necessity comparable to diplomacy, finance, or defense.
The consequences of this collapse are now evident. When crises erupt, there are fewer platforms capable of speaking with independence, depth, and global reach from outside the dominant narrative space. This vacuum affects Muslims, Palestinians, Venezuelans, Africans, Asians—any society whose reality is routinely mediated through lenses not of its choosing.
The question, then, is no longer simply who speaks for Muslims. It is broader and more urgent: who speaks for the oppressed when power and narrative converge against them?
Until media plurality is treated as a matter of justice rather than preference, imbalance will persist. Until independent platforms are funded, professionalized, and protected, alternative perspectives will remain episodic and fragile. And until societies in the Global South recognize that narrative sovereignty is as vital as political or economic sovereignty, they will continue to appear in global discourse as subjects of analysis rather than authors of meaning.
This is not a call for sectarian media, nor for ideological echo chambers. It is a call for consistency—for journalism that applies the same moral scrutiny everywhere, that refuses to confuse power with legitimacy, and that recognizes silence itself as a political position. In an age saturated with information, the absence of principled voices is not accidental. It is produced. And it can be reversed—but only when media is finally understood for what it is: not a luxury, not a supplement, but a frontline of justice itself.
Baba Yunus Muhammad is the President of the Africa Islamic Economic Forum, a journalist, and an activist focusing on African governance, economic justice, and human rights. His work combines incisive critique with rigorous analysis, advocating for accountability, citizen empowerment, and the defense of African sovereignty. RE: GLOBAL UMMAH SOLIDARITY - globalvision2000administrator - 02-01-2026 RE: GLOBAL UMMAH SOLIDARITY - globalvision2000administrator - 02-18-2026 |