Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
7/7
#1
LONDON BOMBS - FOUR BURNING QUESTIONS ON PRESS TV  
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=11614


Tommorrow Iran's Press TV are transmitting Yvonne Ridley's 'agenda' discussion show with Myself, David Aaronovich, some Chatham House guy and Kenyon Gibson about the London Bombs and whether there should be an enquiry.

http://www.presstv.ir

In it I propose four 'burning questions' about the 7/7 London bombings any one of which smashes a major hole in the official version and is the basis for holding a full and open enquiry into the attacks. I also rammed home the point, I hope, that without this there has been simply a 'trial by television' with the likes of Aaronovich deciding who did it.

1. Peter Power's 'coincidental' Visor Consultants' exercise which has a 275 x 275 x 275 x 365 = 7,000million to one chance of him telling the truth about having no link to the attack.

2. The 15 minute warning relayed to Associated Press and published under the title 'Netanyahu Changed Plans Due To Warning' by the Israeli Embassy then denied by Scotland Yard that meant Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu didn't leave his hotel to head for Liverpool Street that morning.

3. The cancelled Luton train that means the four alleged bombers couldn't make it to where they were supposed to have blown up the bombs.

4. no CCTV evidence that the four alleged bombers were even on the tube network that day - CCTV snaps being from a 'dummy run' ten days before.

I also went into the concept of targeting innocent people and whether that might help the Islamic or the MI6 cause and about them not being 'clean skins' as we were originally told.


British broadcasters have not made any documentaries which either seriously examine flaws in the official 7/7 story or look at suggested alternative scenarios. However there are at least five films circulating on the internet: BT Final Version; Mind The Gap; Ludicrous Diversions; The Homefront and 7/7 The Ripple Effect which make a case that the four bombers accused by Sir Ian Blair may not be responsible for the attacks. There are four horrifying holes in the British governments official narrative of 7/7. Any one of these should prompt a public enquiry into the attacks but, as part of an apparent cover up, the government has been extraordinarily resistant to one.

1. Peter Power says his company Visor Consultants' exercise at the same
three tube stations on the same day as the attacks was a coincidence. There is a 7,600 million to one chance that he is telling the truth about his exercise having no link to the attack.

2. A warning 15 minutes prior to the explosions relayed to Associated Press (AP) and subsequently published under the title 'Netanyahu Changed Plans Due To Warning' by several English language newspapers. AP's Jerusalem desk were told by the Israeli Embassy that the warning had come from Scotland Yard and that as a result Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu didn't leave his hotel to head for Liverpool Street that morning. Scotland Yard have denied making the call.

3. The cancelled Luton to Kings Cross train implies the four alleged
bombers could not make it in time to where they were supposed to have blown up the bombs.

4. Despite the number of cameras there is no CCTV evidence in the public domain that the four alleged bombers were anywhere on the tube network that day - CCTV snaps released to the press being from a 'dummy run' nine days before.

There are at least twenty more minor questions which also throw serious
doubt on the government's 2006 'narrative' including evidence the famous Luton CCTV picture was 'Photoshopped', that the alleged bombers may have been terrorist exercise 'actors' and survivors' reports that the bombs exploded underneath the trains. There is also the fact that tube privatisation in October 2004 allowed an extremely secretive private Israeli business, Verint Systems, 24hr. access to London's entire
Underground System. There have been no inquests for the alleged bombers as the law demands. Nobody will put their name to the government 'narrative' which is supposed to explain the attacks.

There is also the overall modus operandi in which the targeting of ordinary people, two-and-a-half million of whom turned out two years previously to protest against the attack on Iraq, contradicts the bombers supposed motives. With recent revelations that David Cameron's think tank 'Policy Exchange' has been caught fabricating evidence of Muslim extremism there is an alternative hypothesis developing: that God fearing Muslims have replaced the Soviet Union as establishment's 'bogey-men' and are being 'set-up' for far right interests, much like the Jews were demonised by the Nazis.

I am concerned about the racist overtones of the Government/Metropolitan Police's version of events which hasn't been properly tested in court amounting to a extra-judicial 'trial by media' of the four bombing suspects.






Reply


Messages In This Thread
7/7 - by Admin - 10-13-2007, 09:56 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)