Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
SEPTEMBER 11 2001 : THE CRIMES OF WAR COMMITTED IN THE NAME OF 9/11
#44
911 THE NEW EVIDENCE
Ian Henshall

My new book, 911 The New Evidence, is now out. The press release,

which lists some of the main points, and is written for the

mainstream media, is below.



I have now been on about 6 local radio stations with the book, saying

some pretty strong things. My line is that the official story is

complete garbage, a stupid conspiracy theory, but I don't claim to

know what exactly happened. To find out, and we would find out pretty

fast, an independent prosecutor is required. For those interested in

what actually happened perhaps the most intriguing evidence is that

Raytheon were indeed testing remote control systems on civilian

Boeings in summer 2001 and that a series of high level Raytheon execs

were on the apparently hijacked planes.



I was on aljazera English last night and said Al Qaeda was always

hand in glove with the CIA, the new bin Laden video looked nothing

like him, the voice was most likely morphed and even Washington

politicians recognise that the 2004 obl video handed Bush the

election. Perhaps in response to this BBC News deceitfully stated

this morning (radio 4 9.00 am) "analysts confirmed" the video was genuine.



By the way, a series of scientists including Lyn Margolis (world

renowned biologist) and top rank fire engineers, structural engineers

and architects have recently stated the Twin Towers must have been

brought down with pre-set cutter charges (the argument is based on

conservation of momentum, any A level physics student can

understand). The official 911 story is increasingly unsustainable.



Just yesterday a senior member of the National Union of Journalists

told me that the failure of key figures of the establishment Left

(George Monbiot, Greg Palast, New Statesman, Tariq Ali, Alexander

Cockburn, Norman Soloman) to endorse the call for a criminal probe

into the Washington racketeers behind the attacks (or at least who

ensured the success of the attacks) is deplorable. In my view it is a

failure of historic proportions. The cause is a mixture of careerism,

stupidity, laziness, infiltration, and the pervasive power of the

pro-Isreal lobby for whom 911 was a godsend.



The upside to all this is that, perhaps sooner than many of us think,

the media and sections of the public still in denial will be forced

to recognise the enormity of what has happened: a group of racketeers

has participated in the mass murder of Americans as part of a larger

plot to steal Iraqi oil, at the cost of an ongoing genocide in the

Middle East. (Most Iraqis believe the bloodbath there has been

largely created by the occupation to justify their continued

presence, the old divide and rule tactic)



My book finishes with a call for a major independent criminal

commission, supervised by ordinary people (for instance relatives of

the 911 victims), with full subpoena powers to examine any file

anywhere on demand, and particularly those covered by state and

commercial secrecy. This will flush out a great deal more that just

the crimes of 911 and Iraq.



There may before long be a major opportunity to institute near

revolutionary democratic institutional change in US/UK with large

sections of the global elite - political, military, commercial and

particularly the media facing the charge gross failure and in some

cases of being accessories after the fact. There will be the prospect

of a decisive defeat for the centralisers who mean to use corporate

and state power to make us all into virtual slaves and the neonazis

in Washington and London who wish to abolish any vestige of

democratic control and institute Orwellian permanent warfare.



What can you do to help? Call phone in programmes and after you have

had your say on whatever the question add that you think it is

deplorable that national broadcasters refuse to even report that

there is doubt over the 911 official story, that it is a highly

unlikely conspiracy theory, like the lies about the weapons of mass

destruction, mention the anthrax attacks which were traced to US

military grade anthrax. Do NOT order my book from a bookshop unless

they promise to put copies on display (it sells like hot cakes, if

they won't they are operating pure censorship). If you come into

contact with politicians or media people tell them what you think, be

moderate in what you allege (so they can't go into denial and dismiss

you as a nutter) but angry about the cover-up.





Press release



7 September 2007



911 The New Evidence



A new book challenges many of the myths which have grown up around

the 911 attacks. 911 The New Evidence, out now in the UK (Constable)

and soon in the US (pub Carol and Graf), makes the case for a new

fully independent investigation into the 911 attacks. Author Ian

Henshall is available for interview.



Henshall's call for a new enquiry with blanket subpoena powers is

supported by a Zogby poll out today (ref see below): 51% of Americans

support a new congressional enquiry into Bush and Cheney's role

before during and after the 911 attacks, 30% support the immediate

impeachment of Bush and Cheney and 67% say the 911 Commission should

have investigated the still unexplained collapse of Building 7 (which

was announced to the media 30 minutes before it fell symmetrically to

the ground at freefall speed). Previous polls have found that fewer

than 20% of Americans believe they have been told the full story of

the 911 attacks. Although some broadcasters have suggested otherwise,

911 victims groups are in the forefront of demands to reopen the

enquiry. Many witnesses heard by the 911 Commission have denounced it

as a whitewash, concurring with commissioner Max Cleland who resigned early on.



Ian Henshall is co-author with Rowland Morgan of the best seller 911

Revealed, described in the Sunday Times as exposing "vast gaps" in

the official story. 911 Revealed became a non-fiction best seller.

Henshall has now trailed through a wide range of Washington

officials' memoirs, US government documents and mainstream press

reports, concluding that the myths of the 911 attacks - the lack of

warnings, the lucky 19 hijackers, the silent takeovers of the planes'

cabins, the passengers' mobile phone calls - cannot be true.



Interviews and review copies



Henshall is available for interviews. Please respond to this email to

arrange an interview. Bona fide media people should contact the press

officers below for review copies.



Background Information



Henshall has established that:



* The 2006 Moussaoui trial and Inspectors' reports have confirmed

accusations from FBI officers in the field: in summer 2001 a network

of senior CIA, Justice Department and FBI officials systematically

obstructed the FBI field officers who suspected what was planned and

could have foiled the attacks. The FBI was legally the lead agency.

CIA officers at first falsely testified that they had informed the

FBI of the threat posed by alleged hijackers Al Hazmi and Al Mihdhar

and later told inspectors they "could not recall" why they did not.



* The "anti-hijack exercise" scheduled by the Pentagon at the time

the "real" attack took place seems more than an extraordinary

coincidence and a close reading of partially released air traffic

control transcripts indicates that the exercise may have involved at

least one of the planes used in the attacks.



* If video and flight recorder evidence released by the US government

is correct, Flight 77 could not have hit the Pentagon.



* The government admitted at the Moussaoui trial that contrary to the

official myth, reflected in a series of feature films and tv

documentaries, only two mobile phone calls were made from Flight 93.

One reported smoke and an explosion shortly prior to the crash.



* Condoleeza Rice falsely stated on oath to the 911 Commission that

Bush's August 2001 CIA briefing, which warned him of the possibility

of an attack within America and was still secret at the time she

testified, did not mention any specific targets. In fact it mentioned

New York and warned of a possible hostage taking. Intriguingly, the

presumed hijackers apparently told passengers on two planes that this

was their plan.



* The "Independent 911 Commission" misrepresented evidence from

Pentagon officials, made false statements and failed to ask the right

questions. The Commissioners, far from being independent, were

trusted members of Washington's permanent government. Commissioner

Hamilton the leading Democrat was a political ally of Cheney from

when they worked together to limit the Iran-contra scandal in the

late 1980's. Commissioner Cleland resigned in disgust.



* Early official reports into the collapse of the Twin Towers present

clear evidence - vaporised and sulpfurised steel, seismic events

preceding the plane impacts - suggesting that, as eyewitnesses

reported at the time, the neat symmetrical collapse of the Twin

Towers and Building 7 at near freefall speed was the result of

explosions in the buildings.



* Ex UK foreign minister Robin Cook wrote in The Guardian that the

original meaning of Al Qaeda was "the database", ie the list of

Afghan arab freedom fighters closely linked to if not controlled by

the CIA. Recent statements from officials, along with press reports

at the time, make it clear that Al Qaeda had links with the CIA or

the DIA well into the 1990's. Osama Bin laden's move from Sudan to

Afghanistan was managed by Ali Mohamed, Washington's spy at the heart

of Al Qaeda who trained Osama Bin laden's personal bodyguards.

Alleged 911 ringleader Khaled Sheikh Mohammed lived in Pakistan for

years while secretly indicted by the US Justice Department. He was

probably an asset of Pakistan's ISI. US government documents show the

ISI was working closely with George Tenet and the CIA on a secret

project in the months before 911. Its boss General Ahmad was in

secret Washington meetings with top officials and congressmen before

during and after the 911 attacks. Reports from India, supported by

the French media said that the terrorist money trail went back to

Ahmad, who took early retirement shortly after the news came out. The

claim by Washington journalist Gerald Posner that the ISI was

colluding with Al Qaeda against the wishes of the CIA seems an

unlikely explanation.



8. A close examination of the paper trail from 2000 and 2001 shows

beyond doubt that the decision (and probably detailed planning) to

invade Iraq was taken before, not after, the 911 attacks and CIA boss

Tenet was involved in the plans. The record shows an unusual series

of long meetings (denied by Tenet in evidence he gave on oath to the

911 Commission) with Bush in Texas in the weeks up to 911. One such

meeting, still unacknowledged in Tenet's recent memoirs, lasted for a

full day and included the chiefs of staff whose planes apparently

failed to intercept any of four hijacked planes. The official account

has left an unexplained and undocumented black hole of 20 minutes at

the Pentagon situation room at the height of the crisis.



9. Cheney who championed plans to invade Iraq before 911 was in

charge of the Pentagon on the morning of 9/11 and almost certainly in

charge of the hijack exercise.



10. BBC News was recently embarrassed by video surfacing on the

internet which showed an announcer stating the the "Saloman Brothers

Building" (WTC7) had collapsed while in the background it still stood

intact. WTC7 housed the largest Secret Servcice office in the US and

was the repository of high level fraud investigations. Many of these

records were lost in the collapse.



Henshall draws no firm conclusions but ends with a working hypothesis

for investigators to follow up.



"9/11 THE NEW EVIDENCE"

pub Sept 2007 Constable (UK) ISBN 978-1-84529-514-1

http://www.amazon.co.uk/11-New-Evidence-...845295145/







"9/11 Revealed: The New Evidence"

pub Oct 2007 Carroll & Graf (US) ISBN-10: 0786720417

http://www.amazon.com/9-11-Revealed-New-...786720417/






Zogby Poll details

For the full poll and demographic breakdown of results, see:

http://www.911truth.org/images/ZogbyPoll2007.pdf
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: SEPTEMBER 11 2001 : THE CRIMES OF WAR COMMITTED IN THE NAME OF 9/11 - by globalvision2000administrator - 01-07-2023, 07:02 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)