Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
GLOBAL UMMAH SOLIDARITY
#81
AT A TIME WHEN THE ISLAMIC WORLD DEMANDS AND NEEDS A CONCERTED VOICE INDEED NO MORE OR LESS THAN A MUSLIM BLOC WHICH ADVOCATES, DEFENDS AND CHAMPIONS ISLAMIC INTERESTS GLOBALLY. WHY DID IMRAN KHAN HAVE AN EMERGENCY MEETING WITH MBS AND KOWTOW TO HIM AND WITHDRAW FOR THE MALAYSIAN SUMMIT? THE ANSWER IS CLEAR AND WILL BE DISCUSSED SOON. THIS DENTS ANY ISLAMIC WORLD LEADERSHIP THAT PAKISTAN ASPIRES TOWARDS. LEADERSHIP REQUIRES VISION, COURAGE, STRENGTH AND ABIDING BY PRINCIPLES.  

HOWEVER, 
MUSLIM LEADERS LIKE MAHATHIR, ERDOGAN, ROUHANI AND TAMIMI HAVE COME FORWARD. THERE IS A BELATED REALISATION THAT THE MUSLIM WORLD IS BESET BY A CRISIS WHICH IS UNDERMINING ISLAMIC CIVILISATION AND IDENTIFYING ISLAM AND MUSLIMS WITH FAILURE, TERRORISM, BAD GOVERNANCE AND  UNDERDEVELOPMENT. ALSO THE MUSLIM WORLD IS DEPENDENT ON NONMUSLIMS POLITICALLY, ECONOMICALLY AND MILITARILY AND NEED TO CHART A NEW ROUTE TOWARDS SELF DETERMINATION AND SELF RELIANCE.  THE CURRENT MODEL IS FAILING AND IS A FAILURE AND NEEDS A NEW MODEL. THE MESSAGE OF THE KUALA LUMPUR SUMMIT NEEDS A CAREFUL ANALYSIS HEREAFTER.     



MUSLIM COUNTRIES MUST FOCUS ON NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT SAYS DR MAHATHIR MOHAMMAD IN KL SUMMIT KEYNOTE ADDRESS



Dr MAHATHIR MOHAMMAD SLAMMED OIC ABOUT THEIR STANCE AGAINST KL SUMMIT



KUALA LUMPUR SUMMIT
ERDOGAN : 94% OF PEOPLE KILLED IN CONFLICTS ARE MUSLIM



Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has left Kuala Lumpur following his address to a gathering of more than 450 Islamic leaders and intellectuals in that country. The meeting is aimed at finding solutions to the problems facing the Muslim world. As TRT World's Hasan Abdullah finds, some leaders are calling for the western world to take action.




PAKISTAN WITHDREW FROM MALAYSIA SUMMIT DUE TO PRESSURE FROM SAUDI ARABIA , SAYS ERDOGAN 



SAUDI ARABIA HAS STOPPED IMRAN KHAN TO GO TO MALAYSIA TO SUMMIT - ERDOGAN 



       
SAUDI ARABIA CORRECTED THE STATEMENT OF TURKEY ABOUT KL SUMMIT 




IMRAN KHAN's MALAYSIA KL SUMMIT 2019 LIKELY TO BE CANCELLED 



IS IT TIME FOR A NEW OIC?
https://www.trtworld.com/opinion/is-it-t...-oic-32444

The Saudi-led OIC must recognise the desire for autonomy and real change in Muslim countries or risk being replaced by new actors. Most Muslim countries are in a state of crisis. That much is clear for all to see. As Muslims witness the ongoing civil wars, foreign intervention and economic deprivation, they wonder, often aloud, "Where is the Muslim unity?”

Exactly 50 years ago, an international body was created for this exact purpose. With 57
member states, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (formerly Conference) is the second largest international body in the world after the UN. However, despite its size and projects, many Muslims today are unaware the institution even exists.

The OIC was formed out of a Muslim summit held between September 22 and 25 1969 in Rabat, Morocco, in response to an arson attack on the al Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem. The OIC’s charter declares Jeddah as the body’s temporary headquarters “until the liberation of the city of Al Quds so that it will become the permanent headquarters of the organisation”.

This quote shows not only the centrality of the Palestinian issue for the OIC’s formation, but also Saudi Arabia’s central role in it. At the time, Jeddah must have seemed a natural choice. Saudi Arabia is home to Mecca and Medina, the two holiest cities in Islam. Furthermore, the initiating force behind the summit was King Faisal, the leading pan-Islamic figure of his day. But the Saudi Arabia of yesterday is very different than the one of today.

Is it time for a new OIC?

In light of the Muslim world’s current depressing situation, the Malaysian President Mahathir Mohamad called for a conference in Kuala Lumpur to gather scholars and activists from across the Muslim world together. He described it as: “[A] first step … to help Muslims recover their past glories, or at least to help them avoid the kind of humiliation and oppression that we see around the world today.”

The summit has mostly focused not only on political issues, but especially the need for sustainable development in the Muslim world. The summit’s declaration almost immediately sparked rumours and fears that the five primary countries of Malaysia, Turkey, Indonesia, Pakistan and Qatar were trying to form a new bloc of power to rival the OIC.

While Mahathir officially denied such accusations personally to Saudi Arabia’s King Salman bin Abdulaziz, it seems to have been to no avail.

‘National Security Concerns’

Leading up to the summit, most of the coverage was focused not on the conference’s agenda or its potential, but rather on Pakistan’s withdrawal.  After being “summoned” for a meeting with Saudi Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman four days before the summit, Pakistan’s Imran Khan bowed out of the conference. It is being widely reported that Khan backed out from the Malaysian summit because of economic pressure from Saudi Arabia.

Pakistan, currently facing an economic crisis, secured a $6 billion bailout from Saudi Arabia last year and has four million foreign workers in the country who send remittances back home. The two countries have military cooperation stretching back decades.Furthermore, Pakistan’s ex-president, Pervez Musharraf, who was recently sentenced to death for high treason, is currently living in exile in the UAE, a Saudi ally.

The withdrawal was a major blow as Khan was one of the initiators of the conference after meeting with his Malaysian and Turkish counterparts on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly this September. Khan’s announcement was soon followed by Indonesia’s
Vice President Ma’ruf Amin’s announcement that he too would no longer be in attendance, citing his ailing health.

A rising tide
Saudi Arabia, fearful of a rival bloc or organisation to the OIC, seems to have successfully taken action to diminish the summit’s potential impact. However, by playing geopolitics-as-usual, Saudi Arabia failed to recognise what this summit truly represents in the long term.
While it remains to be seen how many of the suggestions put forward in the summit will be put into policy and actionable steps, the Kuala Lumpur summit highlights and draws attention to the Muslim world’s deep-rooted desire for change and unity.

Most Muslims my age are fed up with Muslim states too busy feuding amongst themselves to achieve true development for their own population, never mind taking action to stop the multiple genocides taking place against fellow Muslim populations. The problems the Muslim world faces are so much larger and deeper than any one institution and it would be unfair to blame them solely on the OIC, which indeed contains valuable and unrecognised projects and programmes, or on any one individual state.

However, most Muslims, fairly or unfairly, fail to see how the OIC has truly led to greater unity for the Muslim world over the past five decades.The Muslim world’s desire for autonomy and real change is not going away anytime soon. Saudi Arabia and the OIC would do well to recognise it or risk being replaced by new actors.






















https://www.pmo.gov.my/2019/12/closing-r...ummit-2019
file://Media-Copy-Closing-Remarks-by-YAB...r-2019.pdf
https://shaykhabdalqadir.com/2019/12/25/...gold-dinar
https://crescent.icit-digital.org/articl...gold-dinar
Reply
#82
INDIAN OCCUPIED KASHMIR FACES A DOUBLE LOCKDOWN  SINCE AUGUST 2019 WITH THE UNILATERAL REVOCATION OF ARTICLE 370 AND 35A ENDING THE REGION'S AUTONOMY AND NOW THE COVID 19 PANDEMIC. NOW THE REST OF US KNOW WHAT IT FEELS BEING UNDER LOCKDOWN. THE VIDEO BELOW ON KASHMIR IS A PANORAMIC OVERVIEW OF THE REGION'S HISTORY IN ENGLISH AND IS USEFUL. APPARENTLY IT WAS ISSUED ON AUGUST 5 2019 WHEN ARTICLE 370 WAS ABROGATED. ALTHOUGH IT IS PRODUCED BY AN INDIAN CHANNEL WITH INDIAN MUSLIM PRODUCTION STAFF THE FINAL EDITORIAL STAMP OF APPROVAL AND CONTROL IS IN NONMUSLIM HINDU HANDS. 


ALTHOUGH IT IS BEING POSTED HERE THERE ARE SEVERAL RESERVATIONS. FIRSTLY ANY REFERENCE TO KASHMIRI MUSLIM FREEDOM FIGHTERS AS TERRORISTS HAS TO BE DISMISSED OUT OF HAND AS PROPAGANDA. THE STRUGGLE   IS THAT OF SELF DETERMINATION NOT TERRORISM.  IT IS NOW A STRUGGLE AGAINST AN INDIAN HINDUTVA FASCIST STATE WHICH IS ONLY ONE STEP AWAY FROM GENOCIDE. IN FORMER TIMES IN ISLAMIC HISTORY THAT WOULD BE TRIGGER FOR A GLOBAL JIHAD AGAINST OPPRESSION AND KASHMIR REMAINS THE TRIGGER FOR WAR IN THE REGION.  SO LET US NOT BEAT ABOUT THE BUSH AT WHAT IS AT STAKE HERE. 

SECONDLY ANY PAKISTANI OR MUSLIM HISTORY OF KASHMIR CAN NOT AFFORD TO BE
JUST OBSERVATIONAL.  AS WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A MAINLY MUSLIM PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN UNDER THE JACKBOOT OF AN OCCUPYING INVADING AND OPPRESSIVE  NONMUSLIM POWER.  THIRDLY THE HISTORICAL OVERVIEW REMAINS SILENT ON EVENTS SINCE AUGUST 2019 WHICH ARE THE WORST VIOLATION OF KASHMIRI HUMAN RIGHTS SINCE 1947.  THIS IS A WORK IN PROGRESS AND AN ALTERNATIVE PAKISTANI HISTORICAL OVERVIEW IN ENGLISH WILL BE SOURCED FOR  BALANCE.  




KASHMIR THE STORY ON THE HISTORY AND TIMELINES OF KASHMIR VALLEY 


A TIMES NOW Exclusive, this documentary series gives an insight into the conflict-ridden region, showcasing facts as they are. The purely observational piece of storytelling is an honest attempt to showcase life in the Kashmir valley. 


MR. JINNAH: THE MAKING OF PAKISTAN 


Ambassador Akbar Ahmed presents the 20th Anniversary Edition re-release of the historical documentary film, "Mr. Jinnah: The Making of Pakistan." The documentary was part of Ambassador Ahmed's 1990s Jinnah Quartet of projects about the founder of Pakistan, which also included "Jinnah," a feature film starring Christopher Lee, an academic book, and a graphic novel. The documentary features unique material and interviews with Jinnah's contemporaries and people close to him, including an unprecedented and rare interview with his daughter, Dina Wadia. This edition of the documentary is accompanied by two specially commissioned introductions by Nafees Akbar Ahmed, the daughter of the creator of the Jinnah Quartet who played young Dina in the feature film "Jinnah," and Frankie Martin, Ibn Khaldun Chair Research Fellow at American University.
Reply
#83
AL QUDS DAY RALLY TAKES PLACE IN TEHRAN 






IRAN MARKS ANNUAL AL QUDS RALLY ONLINE DUE  TO CORONAVIRUS  
https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2020/...irus-video

TEHRAN (Tasnim) - Iran is marking annual Quds Day rally in an online event rather than marching through the streets to avoid the spread of coronavirus.


Rallies to mark Quds Day are held every year in towns and cities across the country and aim to show of support for the Palestinians. But due to an international pandemic this year the Quds Day rally and conference will be held online. Speaking at a press conference on Sunday, head of the Intifada (Uprising) and Quds Center at Iran’s Islamic Propagation Coordination Council, General Ramezan Sharif, said that this year’s Quds Day rallies was going to be commemorated with other methods since the situation is not normal in the wake of the outbreak of COVID-19.


The International Quds Day is an annual event during which demonstrators express their solidarity with the Palestinian people and opposition to the occupation of the Palestinian territories by the Zionist regime of Israel. The day is seen as the legacy of the late founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Imam Khomeini, who officially declared the last Friday of the holy month of Ramadan as International Quds Day back in 1979.


AYATOLLAH KHAMANEI TO DELIVER SPEECH ON INTERNATIONAL QUDS DAY 

https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2020/05/2...i-Quds-Day

Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei is to deliver a speech on the occasion of International Quds Day.  Ayatollah Khamenei’s speech on Friday will be aired live on local and international radio and television channels. Zionist regime understands nothing but force. The Leader, meanwhile, posted a series of tweets on Wednesday, censuring the Israeli regime for its crimes, including appropriating Palestinian lands, and disregard for international law.


Ayatollah Khamenei also said that only the Palestinian people are the ones rightfully entitled to choose their government through a referendum.  In another post, the Leader added that the Islamic Republic supports any nation or group opposing and fighting Israel. 

Every year on International Quds Day, millions of Muslims hold rallies worldwide to reaffirm their call for the liberation of Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories and denounce the Tel Aviv regime’s acts of aggression against the Palestinian people. However, this year, street demonstrations have been canceled in Iran due to the coronavirus pandemic and replaced by online events.

Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani said last week that the country will hold Quds Day events in compliance with protocols set to combat the COVID-19 outbreak. He said Quds Day will take place without its usual annual rallies and will instead be held within the perimeters of Friday prayers, which coincide with Quds Day. The late founder of the Islamic Republic, Imam Khomeini, designated the last Friday of the holy fasting month of Ramadan as Quds Day to mark solidarity with the Palestinian cause. The event, which is marked worldwide, is viewed as an opportunity for all freedom-seeking nations of the world to express their outrage at the Israeli regime for its decades-long occupation of Palestinian territories.

This year’s Quds Day is highly significant amid pro-Israel policies adopted by President Donald Trump’s administration.  In December 2017, Trump officially declared the disputed city of Jerusalem al-Quds as Israel's capital, despite warnings from around the world that the measure risks triggering a fresh wave of violence in the Middle East. In January, Trump alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also unveiled the so-called deal of the century without the presence of Palestinians.   

The scheme calls for the creation of a Palestinian state with limited control over its own security and borders. It also bars Palestinian refugees from returning to their homeland, enshrines Jerusalem al-Quds as “Israel’s undivided capital” and allows the regime to annex settlements and the Jordan Valley.

Resistance front leaders to deliver speech to mark Quds Day
The Quds Day Commemoration Committee in cooperation with the Islamic Radios and Televisions Union (IRTVU) is scheduled to hold a virtual speech ceremony for the leaders of the Palestinian resistance front and various personalities on Wednesday.


The speakers are as follows:
  • Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, secretary general of the Lebanese resistance movement Hezbollah
  • Ismail Haniyeh, head of the political bureau of the Hamas resistance movement
  • Abdul-Malik Badreddin al-Houthi, leader of Yemen's Houthi Ansarullah movement
  • Ziyad al-Nakhalah, leader of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad movement
  • Ayatollah Sheikh Isa Qassim, Bahrain's most prominent Shia cleric
  • Sheikh Qais al-Khazali, leader of Iraq's Asa'ib Ahl al-Haq movement
  • Atallah Hanna, the archbishop of Greek Orthodox Church of Jerusalem al-Quds
  • Sheikh Dr. Abdul-Latif al-Hamim, head of the Sunni Endowment of Iraq

The speech ceremony is to commence at 17:00 local time in the cities of Jerusalem al-Quds, Baghdad, Sana’a and Beirut. It starts at 18:30 local time in the Iranian capital, Tehran.
 
Reply
#84
WHO PROFITS FROM THE BEIRUT BLAST ?
Making the case that the explosion resulted from an attack

https://www.globalresearch.ca/who-profits-beirut-blast/5720678?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles

The narrative that the Beirut explosion was an exclusive consequence of negligence and corruption by the current Lebanese government is now set in stone, at least in the Atlanticist sphere. And yet, digging deeper, we find that negligence and corruption may have been fully exploited, via sabotage, to engineer it.  Lebanon is prime John Le Carré territory. A multinational den of spies of all shades – House of Saud agents, Zionist operatives, “moderate rebel” weaponizers, Hezbollah intellectuals, debauched Arab “royalty,” self-glorified smugglers – in a context of full spectrum economic disaster afflicting a member of the Axis of Resistance, a perennial target of Israel alongside Syria and Iran.



As if this were not volcanic enough, into the tragedy stepped President Trump to muddy the – already contaminated – Eastern Mediterranean waters. Briefed by “our great generals,” Trump on Tuesday said: “According to them – they would know better than I would – but they seem to think it was an attack.”    Trump added, “it was a bomb of some kind.”   Was this incandescent remark letting the cat out of the bag by revealing classified information? Or was the President launching another non sequitur?    Trump eventually walked his comments back after the Pentagon declined to confirm his claim about what the “generals” had said and his defense secretary, Mark Esper, supported the accident explanation for the blast.  It’s yet another graphic illustration of the war engulfing the Beltway. Trump: attack. Pentagon: accident. “I don’t think anybody can say right now,” Trump said on Wednesday. “I’ve heard it both ways.”



Still, it’s worth noting a report by Iran’s Mehr News Agency that four US Navy reconnaissance planes were spotted near Beirut at the time of the blasts. Is US intel aware of what really happened all along the spectrum of possibilities?



That ammonium nitrate

Security at Beirut’s port – the nation’s prime economic hub – would have to be considered a top priority. But to adapt a line from Roman Polanski’s Chinatown: “Forget it, Jake. It’s Beirut.”     Those by now iconic 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate arrived in Beirut in September 2013 on board the Rhosus, a ship under Moldovan flag sailing from Batumi in Georgia to Mozambique. Rhosus ended up being impounded by Beirut’s Port State Control.    Subsequently the ship was de facto abandoned by its owner, shady businessman Igor Grechushkin, born in Russia and a resident of Cyprus, who suspiciously “lost interest” in his relatively precious cargo, not even trying to sell it, dumping style, to pay off his debts.



Grechushkin never paid his crew, who barely survived for several months before being repatriated on humanitarian grounds. The Cypriot government confirmed there was no request to Interpol from Lebanon to arrest him. The whole op feels like a cover – with the real recipients of the ammonium nitrate possibly being “moderate rebels” in Syria who use it to make IEDs and equip suicide trucks, such as the one that demolished the Al Kindi hospital in Aleppo.  The 2,750 tons – packed in 1-ton bags labeled “Nitroprill HD” – were transferred to the Hangar 12 warehouse by the quayside. What followed was an astonishing case of serial negligence. 



From 2014 to 2017 letters from customs officials – a series of them – as well as proposed options to get rid of the dangerous cargo, exporting it or otherwise selling it, were simply ignored. Every time they tried to get a legal decision to dispose of the cargo, they got no answer from the Lebanese judiciary.  When Lebanese Prime Minister Hassan Diab now proclaims, “Those responsible will pay the price,” context is absolutely essential.



Neither the prime minister nor the president nor any of the cabinet ministers knew that the ammonium nitrate was stored in Hangar 12, former Iranian diplomat Amir Mousavi, the director of the Center for Strategic Studies and International Relations in Tehran, confirms. We’re talking about a massive IED, placed mid-city.  The bureaucracy at Beirut’s port and the mafias who are actually in charge are closely linked to, among others, the al-Mostaqbal faction, which is led by former Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri, himself fully backed by the House of Saud.



The immensely corrupt Hariri was removed from power in October 2019 amid serious protests. His cronies “disappeared” at least $20 billion from Lebanon’s treasury – which seriously aggravated the nation’s currency crisis.  No wonder the current government – where we have Prime Minister Diab backed by Hezbollah – had not been informed about the ammonium nitrate.   Ammonium nitrate is quite stable, making it one of the safest explosives used in mining. Fire normally won’t set it off. It becomes highly explosive only if contaminated – for instance by oil – or heated to a point where it undergoes chemical changes that produce a sort of impermeable cocoon around it in which oxygen can build up to a dangerous level where an ignition can cause an explosion.




Why, after sleeping in Hangar 12 for seven years, did this pile suddenly feel an itch to explode?

So far, the prime straight to the point explanation, by Middle East expert Elijah Magnier, points to the tragedy being “sparked” – literally – by a clueless blacksmith with a blowtorch operating quite close to the unsecured ammonium nitrate. Unsecured due, once again, to negligence and corruption – or as part of an intentional “mistake” anticipating the possibility of a future blast.  This scenario, though, does not explain the initial “fireworks” explosion. And certainly does not explain what no one – at least in the West – is talking about: the deliberate fires set to an Iranian market in Ajam in the UAE, and also to a series of food/agricultural warehouses in Najaf, Iraq, immediately after the Beirut tragedy.



Follow the money

Lebanon – boasting assets and real estate worth trillions of dollars – is a juicy peach for global finance vultures. To grab these assets at rock bottom prices, in the middle of the New Great Depression, is simply irresistible. In parallel, the IMF vulture would embark on full shakedown mode and finally “forgive” some of Beirut’s debts as long as a harsh variation of “structural adjustment” is imposed.  Who profits, in this case, are the geopolitical and geoeconomic interests of US, Saudi Arabia and France. It’s no accident that President Macron, a dutiful Rothschild servant, arrived in Beirut Thursday to pledge Paris neocolonial “support” and all but impose, like a Viceroy, a comprehensive set of “reforms”. A Monty Python-infused dialogue, complete with heavy French accent, might have followed along these lines: “We want to buy your port.” “It’s not for sale.” “Oh, what a pity, an accident just happened.”



Already a month ago the IMF was “warning” that “implosion” in Lebanon was “accelerating.” Prime Minister Diab had to accept the proverbial “offer you can’t refuse” and thus “unlock billions of dollars in donor funds.” Or else. The non-stop run on the Lebanese currency, for over a year now, was just a – relatively polite – warning.



This is happening amid a massive global asset grab characterized in the larger context by American GDP down by almost 40%, arrays of bankruptcies, a handful of billionaires amassing unbelievable profits and too-big-to-fail megabanks duly bailed out with a tsunami of free money.

Dag Detter, a Swedish financier, and Nasser Saidi, a former Lebanese minister and central bank vice governor, suggest that the nation’s assets be placed in a national wealth fund. Juicy assets include Electricité du Liban (EDL), water utilities, airports, the MEA airline , telecom company OGERO, the Casino du Liban.



EDL, for instance, is responsible for 30% of Beirut’s budget deficit.  That’s not nearly enough for the IMF and Western mega banks. They want to gobble up the whole thing, plus a lot of real estate.  “The economic value of public real estate can be worth at least as much as GDP and often several times the value of the operational part of any portfolio,” say Detter and Saidi.



Who’s feeling the shockwaves?

Once again, Israel is the proverbial elephant in a room now widely depicted by Western corporate media as “Lebanon’s Chernobyl.”

A scenario like the Beirut catastrophe has been linked to Israeli plans since February 2016.  Israel did admit that Hangar 12 was not a Hezbollah weapons storage unit. Yet, crucially, on the same day of the Beirut blast, and following a series of suspicious explosions in Iran and high tension in the Syria-Israeli border, Prime Minister Netanyahu tweeted , in the present tense: “We hit a cell and now we hit the dispatchers. We will do what is necessary in order to defend ourselves. I suggest to all of them, including Hezbollah, to consider this.”



That ties in with the intent, openly proclaimed late last week, to bomb Lebanese infrastructure if Hezbollah harms Israeli Defense Forces soldiers or Israeli civilians.  headline – “Beirut Blast Shockwaves Will Be Felt by Hezbollah for a Long Time” – confirms that the only thing that matters for Tel Aviv is to profit from the tragedy to demonize Hezbollah, and by association, Iran. That ties in with the US Congress “Countering Hezbollah in Lebanon’s Military Act of 2019” {S.1886}, which all but orders Beirut to expel Hezbollah from Lebanon.

And yet Israel has been strangely subdued.



Muddying the waters even more, Saudi intel – which has access to Mossad, and demonizes Hezbollah way more than Israel – steps in. All the intel ops I talked to refuse to go on the record, considering the extreme sensitivity of the subject.  Still, it must be stressed that a Saudi intel source whose stock in trade is frequent information exchanges with the Mossad, asserts that the original target was Hezbollah missiles stored in Beirut’s port. His story is that Prime Minister Netanyahu was about to take credit for the strike – following up on his tweet. But then the Mossad realized the op had turned horribly wrong and metastasized into a major catastrophe.



The problem starts with the fact this was not a Hezbollah weapons depot – as even Israel admitted. When weapons depots are blown up, there’s a primary explosion followed by several smaller explosions, something that could last for days. That’s not what happened in Beirut. The initial explosion was followed by a massive second blast – almost certainly a major chemical explosion – and then there was silence.  Thierry Meyssan, very close to Syrian intel, advances the possibility that the “attack” was carried out with an unknown weapon, a missile -– and not a nuclear bomb – tested in Syria in January 2020. (The test is shown in an attached video.) Neither Syria nor Iran ever made a reference to this unknown weapon, and I got no confirmation about its existence.  Assuming Beirut port was hit by an “unknown weapon,” President Trump may have told the truth: It was an “attack”. And that would explain why Netanyahu, contemplating the devastation in Beirut, decided that Israel would need to maintain a very low profile.



Watch that camel in motion

The Beirut explosion at first sight might be seen as a deadly blow against the Belt and Road Initiative, considering that China regards the connectivity between Iran, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon as the cornerstone of the Southwest Asia Belt and Road corridor.  Yet that may backfire – badly. China and Iran are already positioning themselves as the go-to investors post-blast, in sharp contrast with the IMF hit men, and as advised by Hezbollah Secretary-General Nasrallah only a few weeks ago.



Syria and Iran are in the forefront of providing aid to Lebanon. Tehran is sending an emergency hospital, food packages, medicine and medical equipment. Syria opened its borders with Lebanon, dispatched medical teams and is receiving patients from Beirut’s hospitals. It’s always important to keep in mind that the “attack” (Trump) on Beirut’s port destroyed Lebanon’s main grain silo, apart from engineering the total destruction of the port – the nation’s key trade lifeline.



That would fit into a strategy of starving Lebanon. On the same day Lebanon became to a great extent dependent on Syria for food – as it now carries only a month’s supply of wheat – the US attacked silos in Syria.  Syria is a huge exporter of organic wheat. And that’s why the US routinely targets Syrian silos and burns its crops – attempting also to starve Syria and force Damascus, already under harsh sanctions, to spend badly needed funds to buy food.  In stark contrast to the interests of the US/France/Saudi axis, Plan A for Lebanon would be to progressively drop out of the US-France stranglehold and head straight into Belt and Road as well as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Go East, the Eurasian way. The port and even a great deal of the devastated city, in the medium term, can be quickly and professionally rebuilt by Chinese investment. The Chinese are specialists in port construction and management.



This avowedly optimistic scenario would imply a purge of the hyper-wealthy, corrupt weapons/drugs/real estate scoundrels of Lebanon’s plutocracy – which in any case scurry away to their tony Paris apartments at the first sign of trouble.  Couple that with Hezbollah’s very successful social welfare system – which I saw for myself at work last year – having a shot at winning the confidence of the impoverished middle classes and thus becoming the core of the reconstruction.  



It will be a Sisyphean struggle. But compare this situation with the Empire of Chaos – which needs chaos everywhere, especially across Eurasia, to cover for the coming, Mad Max chaos inside the US.  General Wesley Clark’s notorious 7 countries in 5 years once again come to mind – and Lebanon remains one of those 7 countries. The Lebanese lira may have collapsed; most Lebanese may be completely broke; and now Beirut is semi-devastated. That may be the straw breaking the camel’s back – releasing the camel to the freedom of finally retracing its steps back to Asia along the New Silk Roads.



THE BEIRUT BLAST. 
“AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE GEOPOLITICAL FORCES AT WORK”
 Dr. Chandra Muzaffar
Global Research, August 09, 2020

Four days after the Beirut Blast of 4th August 2020, the Lebanese president, Michel Aoun, has attempted to explain what caused the largest explosion since the end of the Second World War. He attributes it to either the accidental ignition of 2750 tons of Ammonium Nitrate (AN) stored in a warehouse at Beirut port or a planned attack by some external entity. There is maybe a nexus between the two causes.

If the blast was an accident, its impact has been devastating. More than a 160 people have died so far and at least 6000 have been injured. Most observers agree that the storage of the fertilizer did not adhere to safety procedures. Negligence and incompetence appear to have scarred the 6 year storage of the AN. Besides, it is alleged that fireworks were also  stored close to the warehouse recently.

A number of officials connected to the port and customs have been arrested. The elected government made up largely of representatives from the Shia and Christian communities is determined to show that it will not tolerate gross dereliction of duty and ineptitude. At the same time it is aware that it should not scapegoat any individual or group in order to protect the real culprits behind the blast.

It is quite conceivable that the real culprits are linked to the second likely cause —  a planned attack. This theory which has different variations has been advanced by some respected commentators. One such variation by the French writer, Thierry Meyssan argues that “Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu authorized a strike against a Hezbollah arms depot using a new weapon that has been tested for seven months in Syria.” The weapon which “is a missile with a tactical nuclear component in its warhead – causes a smoke mushroom characteristic of nuclear weapons “  but  “is obviously not an atomic bomb in the strategic sense. “It has also been deployed against Iranian military vessels in the Persian Gulf

Israel has of course denied  that it was behind the Beirut blast.  The Hezbollah leader, Hassan Nasrallah, has also insisted that his group has no arms depot at the Beirut port. In this regard it should be noted that it was Netanyahu who in a speech at the UN General Assembly  on 27 September 2018 alluded to alleged Hezbollah arms at a warehouse in Beirut port.  The allegation has never been proven.


This is why there has to be an impartial inquiry into the Beirut Blast of 4th August President Aoun and the Hezbollah are against internationalizing the inquiry. They fear that given  US and Western influence within the international system such an inquiry will be manipulated to exonerate Israel. A way out of this situation would be for the UN Secretary-General Antonio Gutteres to establish a small Committee of Inquiry comprising  a representative each from the US, France, China and Russia with the UNSG as the chair whose main objective  would be to determine who was responsible for the blast. The Committee will report its findings directly to the UN General Assembly.


The Committee should  look deeply at the two causes which President Aoun referred to. In examining the second possibility— an external attack  — the Committee one hopes will have the courage and the principles to reveal why Lebanon has been under tremendous pressure in the last few months, both economic and political, aimed at emasculating the government in Beirut and  bringing about a regime change that will benefit  Israel and  Western interests
Without such an understanding of the geopolitical forces at work  in the region where Lebanon is located,  it will not be possible  to fathom why the Beirut Blast occurred.
Reply
#85
THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE UAE RECOGNITION OF ISRAEL NEEDS URGENT
ATTENTION. NOT ONLY IS THIS ANOTHER MARKER 
 OF THE RISING POWER OF GREATER ISRAEL BUT 
THE SURRENDER, SUBSERVIENCE, HUMILIATION AND DEGRADATION OF THE ARAB MUSLIM NATIONS IN FRONT OF THEIR ARCH ENEMY. 

IT IS CLEAR THAT THE SATANIC DAJJALIC ZIONIST IMPERIALIST AND RACIST STATE IS A CANCER WHICH HAS BEEN IMPLANTED BY THE WEST AND SUPPORT OF CHRISTIAN ZIONISTS. THIS BRUTAL CONQUEST AND COLONIALISM IS NOW CROWNED WITH NOTHING LESS THAN ARAB CAPITULATION.  HOWEVER, IT HAS OPENED UP ANOTHER NEW CHAPTER IN ISLAMIC HISTORY WHEN NON ARAB MUSLIMS WILL LEAD ISLAM BACK TO VICTORY NO MATTER WHAT THE ENEMIES CONSPIRE. LIKE THE CRUSADERS BEFORE THEY WILL BE BLOWN AWAY BY HISTORY.


THIS HAS BEEN  MENTIONED CLEARLY IN ISLAMIC ESCHATOLOGY AND MAYBE IT IS TIME TO REHEARSE THE FATE OF THOSE PEOPLE INHABITATING THE ARABIAN PENINSULA IN END TIMES. SUFFICE TO SAY THAT ISLAMIC ESCHATOLOGY DOES NOT AND WILL NOT REST IN THE HANDS OF A PEOPLE OR NATION UNFIT FOR GLOBAL ISLAMIC LEADERSHIP. AS ALLAH SWT HAS PROMISED TO RAISE THE BANNER AND POWER OF ISLAM IN THE HANDS OF OTHERS WHO ARE NOT ARABS. WHAT IS TAKING PLACE IS NO LESS THAN IDENTIFICATION OF THE  TWO SIDES IN THE FORTHCOMING GLOBAL BATTLE BETWEEN GOOD AND EVIL AND JUSTICE AND INJUSTICE.   

AS THIS HAS BROUGHT OUT INTO THE OPEN WHAT HAS BEEN CONSPIRING IN THE BACKGROUND FOR DECADES. THOSE IN THE UMMAH WHO ARGUE THAT THIS REPRESENTS TREASON AND BETRAYAL ARE SPOT ON. THIS  BODES ILL FOR THE ARAB MUSLIM NATIONS WHO ARE ACTING ON FEAR COWARDICE AND LOVE OF MATERIALISM. THIS IS ALSO DIVIDING NON ARAB MUSLIM NATIONS FROM THE ARAB STATES AS ARAB NATIONS ARE BEING SEEN TO BE ALLIED TO THEIR ARCH ENEMY AND SURRENDERING JERUSALEM AND AL QUDS. 



THE LINES ARE BEING DRAWN IN THE SAND AND WE WILL SOON SEE WHO GOES DOWN THE QUICKSAND. WHAT CAN BE CLEARLY DEMARCATED IS THAT  IT IS NOT GOING TO BE A PRETTY SIGHT. WHILST THE ZIONISTS AND THEIR ALLIES MAYBE SMILING NOW THEIR FATE WILL NOT BE DISSIMILAR. 





ISRAEL IS GOING TO ESTABLISH MILITARY BASES IN ARAB COUNTRIES 






ISRAEL AND SAUDI ARABIA WILL BECOME SECURITY 
PARTNERS IN FUTURE 




SAUDI ARABIA WILL RECOGNIZE ISRAEL AFTER UAE - 
JARED KUSHNER HINTS 



RESPONSE OF SAUDI ARABIA TO PAKISTAN ON BEHALF OF ARAB NEWS 






Dr ISRAR AHMAD GREAT PREDICTIONS ABOUT NEW MUSLIM BLOC  
Reply
#86
CONSEQUENCES OF US LED REGIME CHANGE WARS IN THE GREATER MIDDLE EAST(the Muslim World).

Reply
#87
KASHMIR A FLASHPOINT IN THE ROOF OF THE WORLD WHICH WE IGNORE AT OUR PERIL

365 OF 370 – THE ECHOES OF FREEDOM 
Kashmir Documentary



PAKISTAN RENEWS SUPPORT TO KASHMIRIS ON BLACK DAY https://www.dawn.com/news/1717262/pakist...-black-day
https://www.dawn.com/news/1717262/pakist...-black-day


MUZAFFARABAD: Kashmiri students take part in a demonstration at Azadi Chowk on Thursday, observing ‘Black Day’ in solidarity with the people of India-held Kashmir.—Online

MUZAFFARABAD: As men, women and children held rallies across the country, including Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK), on Thursday to condemn invasion of occupied Jammu and Kashmir by India on this day in 1947, Pakistan renewed its support to the just cause of Kashmiris, making it clear that their urge for freedom could not be suppressed for long through the use of brute force.

On Oct 27, 1947, India had landed its troops in Srinagar on the premise of an Instrument of Accession purported to have been signed by the then Hindu ruler of the princely state a day earlier after virtually losing authority in the face of a popular public revolt against the autocracy.

India occupied a large part of the valley and took the issue to the United Nations where it pledged to refer to the will of the Kashmiris through a free, fair and impartial plebiscite under the auspices of the world body. But the promise was never kept, which is why Kashmiris across the globe mark October 27 as ‘Black Day’.

“…This Day is a testament to Kashmiris’ legendary courage & resilience they have shown in standing up to the Indian occupation forces over the last 75 years,” said Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif in tweet.

Rallies held to condemn India’s breach of pledge at UN to hold a plebiscite
“Today, the people of Pakistan pay rich tribute to Kashmiris & vow to keep standing by them in their just struggle. The world should not turn a blind eye to Indian human rights abuses in IIOJK, which is a heavily militarized valley. Urge for freedom cannot be suppressed for long,” he added.


Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari also paid tribute to the Kashmiris for rendering sacrifices in the struggle for the right to self-determination and reiterated Islamabad’s resolve to continue backing them in their endeavour.

“Oct 27 is the darkest day in the history of India which emerged as the worst dictator and colonialist country in the world 75 years ago,” he said.

AJK Prime Minister Sardar Tanveer Ilyas also took to Twitter to point out India’s about-face regarding the plebiscite and the worst-ever state-sponsored terrorism being perpetrated by it in the illegally occupied territory of Kashmir.


In Muzaffarabad, a large number of activists lined up behind large banners, inscribed with anti-India and pro-freedom slogans, at a bustling roundabout outside the press club. The demonstration was organised by Pasban-i-Hurriyat Jammu Kashmir, an organisation of post-1989 migrants from Indian occupied Kashmir.
Reply
#88
ATTEMPTS AT ISLAMIC UNITY SINCE THE ABOLITION OF THE KHALIFATE IN 1924 NEED TO BE REVIEWED URGENTLY. THERE WAS THE FAMOUS KHILAFATE MOVEMENT IN THE 1920s WHICH WAS SPEARHEADED BY INDIAN MUSLIMS DURING  BRITISH INDIA. IT'S OBJECTIVE WAS TO RETAIN   THE OTTOMAN KHILAFATE BUT DISSIPATED AFTER MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATURK DISMANTLED IT.

THEN THERE WERE 3 URGENTLY CONVENED PANISLAMIC SUMMITS HOSTED IN 1926-1931 TO WORK OUT WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN THEREAFTER BUT FIZZLED OUT. THEY NEED TO BE REVIEWED AND ESTABLISH WHAT REALLY HAPPENED.  THEREAFTER IN THE EARLY 70S ALMOST 50 YEARS LATER THE LAHORE ISLAMIC UNITY CONFERENCE TOOK PLACE ALBEIT IN THE FRAMEWORK OF INTRA NATION STATE ISLAMIC SOLIDARITY.  ONCE AGAIN IT FIZZLED OUT AND IT WAS CLEAR LEADING CHAMPIONS WERE REMOVED, ASSASSINATED OR KILLED.       


ALMOST ANOTHER 50 YEARS HAVE PASSED AND 100 SINCE THE FATEFUL 1924. SO HOW IS THE INEVITABLE ISLAMIC UNITY GOING TO MANIFEST ITSELF AGAIN ON THE WORLD STAGE. THE CHALLENGE IS STILL THERE BUT WHO, WHERE AND HOW WILL THE LEADER AND MUTAQQI LEADERSHIP EMERGE?   

THE CHALLENGE

THE WORLD'S MUSLIMS AND UMMAH HAS BEEN OPERATING WITHIN THE DAJALLIC SECULAR POLITICAL NEW WORLD ORDER SINCE 1924.  THIS FOLLOWED THE DEFEAT, COLLAPSE AND  DISMEMBERMENT OF MUSLIM EMPIRES:-  SAFAVID EMPIRE, MUGHAL INDIA IN 1857 AND OTTOMANS IN 1924. IT CAN BE ARGUED THAT THE WEAKNESS AND ROT IN THE MUSLIM WORLD WAS MUCH DEEPER AND HAD STARTED EVEN EARLIER. 

SO IT IS VITALLY IMPORTANT FOR MUSLIMS TO UNDERSTAND OUR PREDICAMENT AND THE CHALLENGES WE FACE FROM A  HOLISTIC ISLAMIC DIAGNOSIS AND PRESCRIPTION. THE DESTRUCTION OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE AND KHILAFATE MEANT THE END OF DAR AL ISLAM AND THE COMING OF POWER OF SECULARISED WESTERNISED TURKISH NATIONALISTS WITH THEIR CONTROLLING JEWISH ZIONIST MOVEMENT. WHILST THE HEJAZ UNDER THE SAUDI WAHABBI STATE SURRENDERED TO THE UN. THE HAJJ WAS DESTROYED AND THERE WAS NO DARUL ISLAM NOW AS THE MUSLIM WORLD REVERTED TO THE PRE-HIJRI JAHILIYYAH ERA WHICH CAN BE DESCRIBED AS THE AGE OF DAJJAL. 


l908 YOUNG TURKS COME INTO POWER 

1916 LOSS OF MAKKAH AND MADINAH IN HEJAZ BY THE FIRST
ARAB REVOLT UNDER THE BRITISH PUPPET SHARIF HUSSEIN

1916 SYKES PICOT AGREEMENT CARVING THE REGION INTO 
ANGLOPHONE AND FRNACOPHONE SPHERES OF INFLUENCE

1917 NOVEMBER 2 2017 BALFOUR DECLARATION 

1917 CAPTURE OF JERUSALEM IN DECEMBER 30 2017  
BY BRITISH GENERAL ALLENBY 


1924 ABOLITION OF KHILAFATE BY MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATURK 

1926  10 JANUARY 1926 ABDUL AZIZ DECLARED HIMSELF 

KING OF THE HEJAZ AND IN 27 JANUARY 1927 HE TOOK 
THE TITLE KING OF NAJD 

1930  THE 2 KINGDOMS OF THE HEJAZ AND NAJD WERE UNITED AS THE "KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA"
 
1932  ESTABLISHMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA
 

WHAT  ALL THIS MEANT WAS THAT THE BRITISH AND  GLOBAL KUFR ENSURED THAT THERE WAS NO KHILAFAH  AND KHILAFATE CONTROLLING THE HEJAZ. THE LINKAGE BETWEEN THE KHILAFATE AND THE HAJJ WAS BROKEN PERMANENTLY.  BY CRIPPLING THE KHILAFATE ISLAM WOULD BE POWERLESS. 

SO POST WORLD WAR 1 LED TO THE GLOBAL KUFR CONTROL OF JERUSALEM AND SAUDI WAHABBI CONTROL OVER THE HEJAZ AND HAJJ. THE DAJALLIC NWO INAUGURATED GLOBALLY BOTH EAST AND WEST WTHOUT ANY OPPOSITION. THE LINK BETWEEN THE UMMAH'S DAR AL ISLAM, KHILAFAH AND CONTROL OF HEJAZ AND HAJJ WAS TERMINATED COMPLETELY.  ISLAMIC POWER AND FAITH WERE SEPARATED AND BROKEN. ISLAM WAS DEFEATED AND THE UMMAH SURRENDERED TO THE DAJALLIC NWO. 

THE FAILED RESPONSE   

THERE WERE 3 RESPONSES BY THE MUSLIM WORLD TO THIS DEFEAT IN 1926 AND 1931 


1926 CAIRO'S AL AZHAR INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC KHILAFAH CONGRESS MOTAMAR AL KHILAFAH 
THE ATTEMPT FOR A NEW KHILAFAH WAS SABOTAGED  

1926 MAKKAH'S WORLD MUSLIM CONGRESS 
MOTAMAR AL ALAM AL ISLAMI


ADVOCATED SECULAR TERRITORIAL MUSLIM NATION STATES OPERATING UNDER THE UN. AFTER IBN SAUD's DEFEAT OF SHARIF HUSSAIN THE DEFEATED ARAB KHILAFAH AND KING OF THE ARABS WAS SENT INTO EXILE. IBN SAUD PROCLAIMED THAT THE HEJAZ BELONGED TO THE UMAH AND HE HELD IT AS A TRUST. SAUDI ARABIAN EXPEDIENCY AND DECEPTION HAS ENSURED THAT NO ATTEMPT TO RESTORE THE ISLAMIC KHILAFATE HAS BEEN ALLOWED THEREAFTER. 

  

1931 JERUSALEM's GENERAL ISLAMIC CONGRESS 

THIS WAS HELD AT THE MASJID AL ALAQSA AS A LAST DITCH ATTEMPT WHICH FIZZLED OUT AND HAD THE KHILAFAT MOVEMENT SUPPORT. SO IN 1926 AND 1931 THE MUSLIM WORLD WAS UNABLE TO RESPOND TO THE IMPOSITION OF POLITICAL SECULARISM OF NATION STATES REPLACING DAR AL ISLAM AND PAX ISLAMICA. THE DESTRUCTION OF ISLAM'S UNITARY KHILAFAH STATE WAS REPLACED BY A FRAGMENTATION OF SECULAR STATES UNDER THE ZIONIST CONTROLLED NWO.

THIS WAS ACHIEVED BY A DAJALLIC CONSPIRACY OF THE  ZIONIST JEWS, BRITISH AND SAUDI WAHABBIS. THE PROXY SECULAR SAUDI WAHABBI STATE IMPOSED A SECULAR ISLAM AND DEPOLITICISED AND RITUALISED THE HAJJ SO IT'S UNIQUE SPIRITUAL AND POLITICAL DYNAMISM WAS DESTROYED.

THE SECULARISATION OF THE GOVERNANCE AND GOVERNMENT OF THE MUSLIM WORLD IN TURKEY AND SAUDI ARABIA CREATED SECULAR NATION STATES IN THE SEAT OF THE KHILAFAH AND HEARTLAND OF ISLAM.  

THE DESTRUCTION OF ISLAM'S UNITARY KHILAFAH STATE WAS REPLACED BY A FRAGMENTATION OF SECULAR STATES CONTROLLED BY A ZIONIST CONTROLLED UN NWO. THIS COULD ONLY BE ACHIEVED BY A DAJALLIC CONSPIRACY HATCHED BY THE ZIONIST JEWS, BRITISH AND SAUDI WAHABBIS. 

THIS MEANT THAT THE WORLD OF ISLAM IS WITHOUT POWER TODAY. THE KHILAFAH IS INDISPENSABLE FOR THE RESTORATION OF ISLAMIC POWER, AUTHORITY AND CONTROL. THERE IS A NEED TO ARTICULATE, RESURRECT AND ESTABLISH A NEW DAR AL ISLAM( ISLAMIC PUBLIC ORDER] AND PAX ISLAMICA(ISLAMIC INTERNATIONAL ORDER) FOR THE CONTEMPORARY MUSLIM WORLD.

THE SOLUTION 

FOR THIS CHANGE TO BE SUCCESSFUL IT IS ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL THAT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET HEREWITH : -


  1. THE HIJAZ MUST BE TAKEN OUT OF CONTROL OF THE SAUDI WAHABBI AXIS

  2.  POWER, AUTHORITY AND CONTROL CAN ONLY BE   RESTORED WITH THE LIBERATION OF THE HARAMAIN
     AND HAJJ FROM THOSE WHO DESTROYED THE KHILAFAH

 

THIS WILL HAPPEN WITH THE BREAKDOWN OF THE SAUDI
WAHABBI ALLIANCE AND MUSLIM STATES WITHDRAWING FROM THE DAJALLIC NATION STATES MODEL AND ISLAMIC  PARTIES WITHDRAWING FROM ELECTIONS.


POSTSCRIPT

LET US BE CLEAR THAT SAUDI ARABIA HAS EFFECTIVELY BANNED THE HAJJ IN 1441/2020. THIS MEANS THAT THE CORONA VIRUS- COVID 19 SATANIC DAJALLIC PLANDEMIC  IS BEING USED AS A COVER FOR A DIRECT ASSAULT ON   THE HAJJ,  ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS PRACTICES, ISLAM AND ISLAMIC CIVILISATION. 2.5 MILLION HAJJIS WERE EXPECTED GLOBALLY TO PERFORM THE HAJJ THIS YEAR. THE SCALING BACK TO 1000 LOCAL HAJJIS IS JUST TOKENISM AND CANNOT ERASE THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS HISTORIC DECISION. EFFECTIVELY THE  HAJJ HAS BEEN CANCELLED AND IT IS LEADING TO THE ABANDONMENT OF THE HAJJ  THE FIFTH PILLAR OF ISLAM.

IF THIS IS NOT ESCHATOLOGICAL I DO NOT KNOW WHAT IS. 
BY EXECUTING THIS DECISION LET IT BE CLEAR THAT THE SAUDI REGIME HAS UNDERMINED IT'S LEGITIMACY AS BEING THE CUSTODIANS OF THE HARAMAIN. THEY ARE NOTHING BUT A TRIBAL OLIGARCHY BROUGHT TO POWER AND PAID FOR BY NON MUSLIM WESTERN IMPERIALISTS AFTER THE TREACHERY LEADING TO THE DEMISE OF THE OTTOMANS   IN WW1. 

THE ENDGAME HAS COMMENCED AND THE WRITING IS ON THE WALL AS THE SAUDIS CAN NO LONGER CLAIM THE RIGHT TO BE CUSTODIANS OF THE HARAMAIN NOR DO THEY HAVE ANY POLITICAL LEGITIMACY BY SERVING THE INTERESTS OF WESTERN IMPERIALISM AND THE DAJALLIC NWO. 

AS THE HOUSE OF CARDS BUILT ON SAND DISSOLVES IN FRONT OF OUR EYES THE IMPLICATIONS OF THIS WILL BE REVIEWED HEREAFTER.   

1974 CONFERENCE OF OIC LOOKED QUITE PROMISING BUT THEN THIS HAPPENED 



WHO IS KING FAISAL OF SAUDI ARABIA?




HISTORY OF SAUDI KING FAISAL AND HIS LAST DAYS
IN THE ROYAL PALACE


OTTOMAN CALIPHATE AND THE KHILAFATE MOVEMENT 



SULTAN ABDUL HAMID II



THE ABOLISHMENT OF THE KHILAFAH: 3rd MARCH 1924


WHY DID THE OTTOMAN KHALIFATE COLLAPSE?
Reply
#89
THIS VIDEO EXPOSES HOW RUTHLESSLY THE FRENCH RACIST STATE EXPLOITS WEST AND CENTRAL FRANCOPHONE AFRICA BY CONTROLLING THEIR CURRENCY AND RESOURCES. I HAVE NOT MUCH PATIENCE FOR THE FRENCH GIVEN THEIR HYPOCRISY OF BEING CHAMPIONS OF LIBERTY FRATERNITY AND EQUALITY. THE FRENCH NEED TO BE KICKED OUT OF AFRICA LOCK STOCK AND BARREL AND THE FRENCH CFA  REPLACED.  

BECAUSE OF THIS UNDER DEVELOPMENT NO WONDER SO MANY BLACK AFRICANS FLOCK TO FRANCE. ALSO IT IS NO WONDER WE HAVE A POWERFUL WHITE NATIONALIST AND RACIST BACKLASH. THE FRONT NATIONAL WOULD BETTER DEVOTE IT'S ATTENTION IN ENDING FRENCH COLONISATION OF AFRICA.  SO THAT BLACK AFRICA CAN DEVELOP ITSELF FULLY WITH IT'S OWN RESOURCES  WITHOUT SENDING IT'S LABOUR FORCE TO FRANCE.  

UNIVERSAL JUSTICE DEMANDS AN END TO FRANCE AFRIQUE. 


REBELLION AGAINST FRANCE
COLD WAR BREWING IN SAHEL,  WEST AFRICA?






HOW FRANCE MAINTAINS ITS GRIP ON AFRICA 
Reply
#90
TODAY IS THE ANNIVERSARY OF THE MARCH 23 1940 LAHORE DECLARATION. THIS LAID THE BASIS FOR THE CREATION OF PAKISTAN THE NEW HOMELAND FOR INDIAN MUSLIMS. IT ALSO PAVED THE WAY FOR HIJRA FOR MILLIONS OF INDIAN MUSLIMS. INDEPENDENCE FROM A RUTHLESS COLONIAL POWER WAS ACCOMPANIED BY PARTITION AND FORCED MILLIONS TO ENGAGE IN THE PATH OF PROPHETIC MIGRATION FOR THE SAKE OF THEIR FAITH. 

THIS MUST NOT BE FORGOTTEN AND MUSLIMS NOT ONLY IN THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT BUT GLOBALLY NEED TO RESURRECT THE CONCEPT OF HIJRA IF THEY FIND THEIR FAITH BEING PERSECUTED. GLOBAL VISION 2000 SALUTES THE MEMORY AND SACRIFICES OF THOSE MUHAJIREEN IN 1947 AND INDEED THE GREAT PROPHETIC HIJRAS THAT THEY FOLLOWED. 

THIS EXPERIMENT HAS NOT GONE ACCORDING TO PLAN  NOR HAS IT BEEN COMPLETED. IT IS THE TURN OF THE NEW GENERATION TO COMPLETE THE UNFINISHED TASK OF BUILDING AND TRANSITIONING TOWARDS THE ISLAMIC  STATE OF PAKISTAN BY MOVING AWAY FROM THE CURRENT  FAILED SECULAR MODEL.     

PAKISTAN DAY SONG  23rd MARCH 2021 | ISPR
AIK QAUM  AIK MANZIL 



DEFENCE AND MARTYRS’ DAY SONG  
HAR GHARI TAYYAR KAMRAN 
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)