Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
UNITED STATES OF ISLAM ARMY
#81
SOMEONE HAS GOT TO THE ASK THE QUESTION WHICH NO ONE WILL BE THANKFUL FOR. IT IS PERTINENT TO ASK  HAS WW3 BEEN DECLARED UNOFFICIALLY?  AS WE ARE NOT IN A NORMAL EMERGENCY BUT A GLOBAL EMERGENCY IN WHICH WE ARE A BUTTON AWAY FROM A NUCLEAR EXCHANGE. THAT HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE CASE SINCE THE CREATION OF NUCLEAR WEOPONS. WHAT IS DIFFERENT THIS TIME IS WHEN ONE NUCLEAR PARTY HAS OPENLY DECLARED THE PREPAREDNESS TO USE THEM. THIS IS IN RESPONSE TO INTELLIGENCE SOURCES ALERTING THEM TO THE OTHER PARTIES NUCLEAR PREPAREDNESS.


WE MUST NOT FORGET THAT MODERN WARFARE IS NOT JUST ABOUT VIOLENCE BEING LET LOOSE ON LAND, AIR,SEA, SPACE AND CYBERWORLDS BUT ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL WARFARE.


LET IT BE KNOWN THAT THE CURRENT SATANIC DAJALLIC IDEOLOGICALLY CONTROLLED WORLD ORDER ADMINISTERED AND EXECUTED BY NONMUSLIM POWERS WILL LITERALLY GO UP IN SMOKE . SEE SURAH DUKKAN - THE SMOKE. WHAT  DOES THE QURANIC CHAPTER THE SMOKE IMPLY? MAYBE HUMANITY IS ABOUT TO FIND OUT.

LET US SUM UP THE SITUATION. THE WORLD WE LIVE IN IS CONTROLLED  BY NONMUSLIMS AND NONISLAMIC IDEOLOGIES WHICH ARE THE CAUSE OF THE WORLD'S PROBLEMS. IT IS NOT JUST ABOUT NONMUSLIMS WITH NO CONSCIOUSNESS OF DIVINE SOVEREIGNTY IN ALL MATTERS ON EARTH AND HEAVEN. IT IS ABOUT THE REALITY THAT THE SYSTEMS IN MODUS OPERANDUS ARE NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE. IT HAS BEEN LIKE THAT DEFINITELY IN THE 20TH CENTURY AND MUCH LONGER. THE FACT THAT THESE POWERS THINK THAT IS THE NORM AND THAT WE ARE IN THE NEW NORM IS IN FOR A RUDE DEADLY SHOCK IN WHICH MANY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO AWAKE AS THEY WILL BE WITH THE DEAD.

ALSO THE DEMONIC NEW WORLD ORDER WHICH THINKS IT CAN HAVE A GLOBAL RESET AND NWO OUT OF ORDO AB CHAO IS GOING TO BE CHALLENGED. AS THE DIVINELY BASED NEW WORLD ORDER IS NOT GOING TO LAND ON HUMANITY'S LAP WITHOUT AN EXISTENTIAL STRUGGLE AKA THE LORD OF THE RINGS.  

THE CURRENT SITUATION PRECIPITATING THIS IS THE RUSSIAN-UKRANIAN CRISIS AND NATO AND THE USA. ALL OF THESE POWERS ARE NONMUSLIMS. ALSO IRONICALLY THEY ARE FIGHTING BECAUSE OF THE THREAT THE FREE WORLD AND ITS DEMOCRACY POSES TO THE FREEDOMS OF   ANOTHER BLOC. HOWEVER, SOMEONE HAS TO SAY IT LOUD AND CLEAR ANY SYSTEM WHICH IS NOT BASED ON DIVINE SOVEREIGNTY IS INTRINSICALLY DEMONIC AND A DEMONOCRACY WHETHER EAST OR WEST.  DIVINE NATURAL JUSTICE ALLOWS THIS TO PLAY OUT BUT THEN ACCOUNTABILITY WILL DESCEND WITH A DEADLY VENGEANCE. AS ONLY WHEN THERE IS A PHYSCIAL CLEANSING OF ALL THINGS EVIL CAN THE DIVINELY BASED ORDER BE ESTABLISHED ON EARTH. HUMANITY HAS BEEN SHOWING 2 FINGERS UPWARDS AND IT IS TIME FOR A RECKONING ON WHO CALLS THE SHOTS.

GLOBAL ISLAM WHICH HAS BEEN SUFFOCATED BY THESE POWERS CAN ONLY RISE TO THE SURFACE AND LEAD THE NEW WORLD ORDER AFTER THEY ARE EXHAUSTED.  THEY HAVE HAD THEIR CHANCE FOR SEVERAL HUNDRED YEARS AND SHOWN ALL THEY CAN OFFER IS A WORLD ON THE PRECIPICE OF EXTINCTION. THAT IS WHY THEY ARE NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE AND THE WORLD WILL BE A BETTER PLACE WHEN THEY ARE GONE.     ON THIS SPECIAL NIGHT OF THE PROPHETIC HEAVENLY MIRAJ IT IS ONLY PRAYERS TO THE DIVINE POWER THAT CAN DELAY THE INEVITABLE.




PUTIN PUTS RUSSIA's DETERRENT FORCES ON ALERT AGAINST UKRAINE US EUROPE





ENTIRE FORCES ARE ON HIGH ALERT AGAINST UKRAINE AND ENTIRE EUROPE



HOW RUSSIA IS PLAYING A BIG GAME AGAINST UKRAINE USING THE CHECHEN ARMY



US IS NOT READY TO HELP THE PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE AND ASK HIM TO LEAVE


UKRAINE IS DEMANDING SUPPORT FROM TURKEY AGAINST RUSSIA


ISRAEL YOUR NEXT , RUSSIA 
Kaiser Khan



HOW A TAXI DRIVER PUTIN BECAME THE POWERFUL PRESIDENT OF RUSSIA



INSIDE THE KREMLIN PALACE OF RUSSIAN PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN





EUROPE IN BIG TROUBLE 
Orya Maqbool Jan



UKRAINE AND RUSSIA CONFLICT

Orya Maqbool Jan





THE STAGE FOR WORLD WAR 3 HAS BEEN DESIGNED , WORLD HAS BEEN DIVIDED INTO 2 GROUPS, WHAT WILL BE NEXT







MUSLIM GENOCIDE IN INDIA HAS BEEN STARTED,
GHAZWA I HIND WILL START SOON, DREAM OF HINDUTWA






WHO IS THE FAVOURITE GROUP IN THE EYES OF ALLAH AND BETRAYED GROUP

Reply
#82
RUSSIAN FM WARNS  OF NUCLEAR WEOPONS CAN PUT EVERYONE IN DANGER ZONE





PUTIN THE MOST DANGEROUS PERSON FOR SECRET SOCIETIES AND AGAINST THE NEW WORLD ORDER

Reply
#83
IN LIEU OF THE RUSSIA UKRAINE WAR WHICH HAS ERUPTED IN EUROPE IT IS TIMELY TO FOCUS ON THE BATTLEFIELDS OF THE WILD EAST. IN THE WESTERN MIND THE OPENING UP OF AMERICA IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE WILD WEST AND IS ROMANTICISED IN THE POPULAR MIND. THE WILD EAST LANDS WHICH WILL BE LOOKED AT WERE UNDER CONTROL OF NOMADIC TATAR MUSLIM PEOPLES WHO WERE A LEGACY OF THE GOLDEN HORDE. 

BECAUSE OF LANGUAGE BARRIERS AS WELL AS THE SOVIET COMMUNIST REVISIONIST HISTORY NOT MUCH IS REALLY KNOWN BY OUTSIDERS. SO THE RISE OF RUSSIA, UKRAINE, THE JEWISH KHAZARS  AND THE KHANATES WILL BE REVIEWED. THIS WILL PROVIDE DEEPER DIAGNOSIS ON THE FUTURE OF EASTERN EUROPE, EUROPE AND THE MIDDLE EAST WHICH ARE GEOPOLITICAL TECTONIC AREAS.  



UKRAINE SPECIAL : THE RELIGIOUS ROOTS OF PUTIN's INVASION 
Fr Cyril Hovorun & Clifford Longley



PATRIARCH KRILL
A FORMER KGB SPY AND SPIRITUAL GURU IS THE DRIVING FORCE BEHIND PUTIN's UKRAINE WAR






UKRAINE , ZUL QARNAIN, KHAZARIA JEWS AND CURRENT SITUATION




RUSSIA AND UKRAINE WOO WORLD’s LARGEST ISLAMIC GROUP 
As Muslims Fight On Opposing Sides Of War


[/url]


1917: RUSSIA's TWO REVOLUTIONS




HISTORY OF RUSSIA - RURIK TO REVOLUTION




THE COSSACK WORLD 





TWO CHRISTIAN WORLDS - (East & West)
THE TWO WORLDS OF CHRISTENDOM





GREAT SCHISM: THE BITTER RIVALRY BETWEEN GREEK AND LATIN CHRISTIANITY




KHAZARS: HISTORY OF THE JEWISH TURKIC NOMADS



HOW THE MONGOLS LOST RUSSIA  




BATTLE OF KULIKOVO 1380 - RUS- MONGOL WARS 




HOW RUS SURVIVED MONGOLS AND CRUSADERS
RISE OF NOVOGOROD



DESTRUCTION OF KIEVAN RUS - MONGOL CONQUEST 




ANCIENT ORIGINS OF THE KYIVAN RUS :
FROM RURIKIDS TO MONGOLS 



THE BIRTH OF RUSSIA: KIEVAN RUS
Reply
#84
PAKISTAN AIR FORCE INTERCEPTS INDIAN BRAHMOS SUPERSONIC MISSILE



HOW PAKISTAN CAN STOP NUCLEAR MISSILES OF INDIA AND HOW TO REACT 




PAKISTAN AIR FORCE CAN DITCH  S-400 ANY TIME WHILE HAVING ADVANCE SYSTEMS




DG ISPR Press Conference - 10 Mar 2022




INDIA WILL USE NUCLEAR CAPABLE MISSILE TECHNOLOGY AGAINST PAKISTAN



INDIA ADMITS LAUNCHING SUPERSONIC BRAHMOS MISSILE
AT PAKISTAN
Reply
#85
MODERN FIGHTER AIRCRAFT J-10C INDUCTION IN PAF
PM Imran Khan in Ceremony at Minhas Air Base Kamra




POWERFUL SPEECH OF IMRAN KHAN
WHILE PAKISTAN AIR FORCE INDUCTED J-10C




CHINA IS PROVIDING THE MOST POWERFUL ANTI STEALTH RADAR YLC-8E TO PAKISTAN
Reply
#86
THE COINCIDING OF PAKISTAN DAY'S MILITARY PARADE WITH THE OIC AND THE PRESENCE OF THE CHINESE FOREIGN MINISTER IS A HUGE DEVELOPMENT ON THE WORLD STAGE. IS THE SLUMBERING MUSLIM GIANT AWAKENING AT LAST. GLOBAL VISION 2000 IS WORKING ON THIS BREAKING STORY AND IT's SIGNIFICANCE AT A TIME WHEN GEO TECTONIC PLATES ARE COLLIDING.  

PAKISTAN DAY PARADE - 23 MARCH 2022




PM IMRAN KHAN DASHING ENTRY IN PAKISTAN DAY PARADE 23 March



INDIA IS GETTING ANGRY AFTER OIC MAKING STANCE ON KASHMIR AGAINST INDIA






CHINA IS NOW READY TO DOMINATE AGAINST INDIA IN ARUNACHAL AND LADAKH
Reply
#87
IRAN IS A FRONT LINE STATE AT THE HEART OF THE MIDDLE EAST. IT'S TRAJECTORY FOR IT'S MILITARY AND ECONOMY NEEDS REVIEWING AS IT HAS HAD TO DEVELOP ITSELF IN THE CONTEXT OF SANCTIONS.   ALSO SINCE THE SAFAVIDS IT HAS BEEN THE MAIN SHIA POWER IN THE REGION. THIS ALSO NEEDS TO BE REHEARSED.

IRAN MILITARY PARADE : RAISI WARNS ISRAEL ABOUT MAKING  “ SLIGHTEST MOVE ” AGAINST COUNTRY





RUSSIA -UKRAINE WAR : DID IRAN GIVE LETHAL BAVAR 373 MISSILE DEFENCE SYSTEM TO AID PUTIN’s FORCES?
Reply
#88
IF THERE IS GOING TO BE AN UNITED STATES OF ISLAM ARMY IT IS CLEAR THAT THE PAKISTAN ARMY AS ONE OF THE BIGGEST MUSLIM ARMIES IN THE WORLD WOULD PLAY A CRITICAL ROLE FOR MANY REASONS. ACCORDINGLY A DEEP CRITIQUE WILL ROLLOUT IN THE INTEREST OF THE UMMAH AS OPPOSED TO UNDERMINING IT. 

HOW IMRAN KHAN's REMOVAL AFFECTED CIVIL- MILITARY TIES IN PAKISTAN
As the military bristles at criticism directed at it since Khan’s exit, the ex-PM escalates his rhetoric against the powerful institution.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/4/19...s-pakistan



GRAVITAS: THE POWER AND INFLUENCE OF THE PAKISTAN ARMY



Reply
#89
AT A TIME WHEN THE MUSLIM WORLD SEEMS DEFENCELESS AGAINST THE OPPRESSION BY OTHER POWERS. THE EVENTS IN JERUSALEM AND QUDS DURING RAMADAN AND THE ZIONIST FLAG DAY MARCH HIGHLIGHTS THIS. OTHER GEOPOLITICAL FLASHPOINTS CAN ALSO BE MENTIONED.

ACCORDINGLY THE UMMAH NEEDS TO SALUTE THE EFFORTS OF PAKISTAN IN BECOMING THE ONLY MUSLIM COUNTRY WITH A NUCLEAR ARSENAL. THIS WAS HIGHLIGHTED BY THE NUCLEAR TESTS CONDUCTED ON MAY 28 1998 IN RESPONSE TO INDIAN NUCLEAR TESTS. YAUM E TAKBEER AS IT IS KNOWN SHOULD BE KNOWN BY ALL MUSLIMS GLOBALLY.

IT IS THIS DETERRENCE WHICH HAS SAFEGUARDED THE DEFENCE AND SECURITY OF PAKISTAN.  THIS NEEDS TO BE CELEBRATED AND THE SACRIFICES BEHIND THIS ACHIEVEMENT NEED REHEARSING. AT A TIME OF AN UNDECLARED WW3 THE MUSLIM WORLD NEEDS TO BE ON HIGH ALERT TO DEFEND ITSELF.

PAKISTAN ZINDABAD

AND HERE'S A NEW SLOGAN FOR THE UMMAH- 

TAKBEER ALLAHU AKBAR  ISLAM ZINDABAD




VIDEO OF THE 1998 PAKISTANI NUCLEAR WEOPON TEST  






YAUM E TAKBEER :
Pakistan marks Anniversary of Successful Nuclear Tests





NATION OBSERVES 24TH ANNIVERSARY OF PAKISTAN's NUCLEAR TESTS 




STORY OF PAKISTAN BECOMING THE FIRST MUSLIM NUCLEAR POWER

Former Foreign Secretary Shamshad Ahmad






PAKISTAN KE ATOMIC KI KAHANI 
Ex-Secretary Defense General Naeem Khalid Lodhi


Reply
#90
ERDOGAN: GREECE MUST STOP MILITARISING AEGEAN ISLANDS


Greece 'turning country into huge US base': Greek MP

https://www.trtworld.com/europe/greece-t...k-mp-57991








HOW GREECE's MILITARISATION OF AEGEAN ISLANDS VIOLATES INTERNATIONAL LAW
https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/how-gr...-law-58276

From the Montreux convention to Lausanne Peace Treaty, Greece is showing no regard for any international agreements, reversing all the diplomatic gains between Ankara and Athens and fanning regional tensions.


Earlier this month, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan announced suspension of bilateral ties with Greece over what he described as “militarisation” of islands on the eastern Aegean Sea in violation of international agreements. In hard-hitting comments, Erdogan later reminded Athens about the Turkish war of independence when the Turks had defeated the combined military of the occupying forces that included Greece.

Greece claims that its actions are within the purview of global norms and that it had the right to act in self-defence.
On the other hand, Türkiye insists that Greece has violated international treaties and its obligations under international law.
But what do the international treaties say about the demilitarised status of the islands? A closer look at the rules of international law and provisions of international treaties that regulate the demilitarised status of the islands disprove Greece’s claims and show that Athens is indeed violating international law.

For a clear picture, the group of islands can be grouped into three, considering the international treaties that regulate their legal status.North-eastern Aegean Islands and Central Aegean Islands.  As per Article 13 of the Lausanne Peace Treaty (1923), any naval base and fortification cannot be established on the islands of Lesbos, Chios, Samos, and Nikaria. Considering these restrictions’ purposes, namely ‘ensuring the maintenance of peace’ and preventing attempts for aggressive preparations, Article 13 implies these islands’ demilitarisation, which includes not establishing an army base, naval base and air base.

In addition to those restrictions, Article 13 stipulates that “the Greek military forces in these islands will be limited to the normal contingent called up for military service”. ‘Normal contingent’ implies that Greek military forces on these islands could consist only of people from these islands who can be conscripted for an officially determined duration, which is presently between 9 to 12 months.

Moreover, the number of police and gendarmerie will be in proportion to the number of those existing in the rest of Greece. Therefore, having police and gendarmerie forces is limited to the purpose of keeping peace on these islands.

Lemnos and Samothrace 
Article 4 of the Lausanne Convention Relating to the Regime of the Straits (1923) requires demilitarisation of the islands of Lemnos and Samothrace. Within the scope of demilitarisation, no fortifications, no permanent artillery organisation and no military aerial organisation are allowed on these islands. Moreover, no armed forces shall be stationed except the police and gendarmerie forces that are necessary for the maintenance of order.

Greece claims that the Montreux Convention Regarding the Regime of the Straits (1936) terminated the Lausanne Convention, and since the Montreux Convention does not have any provision regarding demilitarisation of Lemnos and Samothrace, the rule on demilitarisation does is no longer valid for these islands.

First and foremost, however,  the Montreux Convention does not have any explicit provision that indicates ‘termination’ of the Lausanne Convention.

Secondly, the subject and scope of the Montreux Convention are not the same as the Lausanne Convention’s. Therefore, since the termination of the Lausanne Convention would mean leaving some issues unregulated, it is difficult to infer ‘termination' of the Lausanne Convention from the wording of the Montreux Convention.

Finally, the Montreux Convention aims at regulating the status of straits and ensuring Türkiye’s security. Also, the legal status of Lemnos and Samothrace is determined differently under the Lausanne Peace Treaty than the legal status of the areas under Türkiye’s sovereignty. For these reasons alone, even if the Montreux Convention ended the demilitarised status of some areas under Türkiye’s sovereignty, it is reasonable to expect the continued demilitarised status of Lemnos and Samothrace.

The Dodecanese Islands
The Dodecanese Islands include Stampalia, Rhodes, Calki, Scarpanto, Casos, Piscopis, Nisyros,  Calimnos, Leros, Patmos, Lipsos, Symi, Cos and Kastellorizo. Article 14 of the Paris Peace Treaty (1947) sets forth that these islands shall be and shall remain demilitarised. The demilitarisation provision prohibits any naval, military, air installations, fortifications and armaments in the territory and territorial waters concerned.

Considering the relevant treaty provisions, it is obvious that Greece’s breach of these provisions is a violation of international law. Moreover, the Paris Peace Treaty establishes an objective regime regarding the demilitarised status of these islands. Therefore, contrary to Greece’s claims, Türkiye has the right to demand that the demilitarised status of these islands be respected.

Are Greece’s claims justified? 
Greece claims that provisions regarding demilitarisation of the islands lost their raison d’être and there is a change in circumstances. Therefore, the demilitarisation provisions are no longer applicable. Moreover, Greece claims that militarisation of the islands falls within its right to self-defence, therefore it is in compliance with international law. However, there is no legal basis for such claims.

Greece claims that there  was a change in the conditions when the  islands’ demilitarised status was determined. Because, afterward, Greece and Türkiye signed treaties of friendship and both countries joined NATO. Since those reduce the high risk of military confrontation and  constitute the raison d'être of demilitarisation, there is no justification in the clause that calls for disarming the islands.

However, Greece’s claims are not valid since the conditions necessary for ending the demilitarised status does not apply. Because, first of all, there has to be a fundamental change to end the demilitarised status of islands. But the fact that the relationship between the two countries is getting better is not a fundamental change. Similarly, NATO membership does not constitute a fundamental change that would eliminate the high risk of military confrontation. 

Second, such changes do not radically transform the extent of parties’ obligations as would be necessary.

Lastly, the existence of those circumstances did not constitute an essential basis for Greece and Türkiye to be bound by the Lausanne Convention and other treaties that include provisions to regulate the demilitarised status of islands. Because all of these were multilateral treaties and conventions that address not only relations between Greece and Türkiye but also bilateral issues between other signatory countries, such as Türkiye’s borders, Ottoman loans, or minorities. For these reasons alone, Greece cannot change the islands’ demilitarised status.

Claims on self-defence 
The exercise of the right of self-defence in international law is subject to limitations. As per Article 51 of the UN Charter, if an armed attack occurs against a country, a country has a right to self-defence until the UN Security Council takes measures. 

Considering this, Greece’s claims are not in compliance with international law. Athens bases its right to self-defence on alleged violation of the Greek air space and Türkiye’s maintenance of military units, aircraft and a landing craft on the coast of Asia Minor. However, it is not possible for these events to qualify as an armed attack since there is no physical hostility between the two countries.

The right to self-defence can be exercised for a limited time, i.e., until the UN Security Council takes necessary measures. Therefore, Greece, claiming to exercise the right to self-defence, cannot arm the islands with military might for an indefinite time.

For all practical purposes, Athens’ claims on the Aegean Islands hold no water. All evidence points to it.


Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)