Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
HOW GLOBAL ANTI-MUSLIM BIGOTRY BECAME ACCEPTABLE
#71
FISHING RAIDS AND CRACKDOWN ON AUSTRIAN MUSLIMS POINT TO THE CHANGING NATURE OF ISLAMOPHOBIA. THESE WERE COORDINATED WITH EGYPTIAN AND ISRAELI  SECRET SERVICES. THIS MEANS EUROPEAN MUSLIMS ASSOCIATED WITH MUSLIM ACTIVISM IN THIS CASE THE LAW ABIDING  MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ARE BEING TARGETTED. 

THERE ARE SIMILAR PATTERNS IN FRANCE AND ELSEWHERE. THIS NEEDS TO BE MONITORED AND NEUTRALISED AND IT MEANS THAT EUROPEAN MUSLIMS NEED TO ACT ACROSS FRONTIERS ALSO IN TERMS OF COOPERATION AS THEIR CIVIC AND HUMAN RIGHTS ARE BEING ATTACKED.

EGYPTIAN AND ISRAELI COMPLICITY: 
THE UNFOLDING OF A MAJOR CRACKDOWN ON MUSLIMS IN VIENNA 
https://www.cage.ngo/egyptian-and-israel...in-vienna?


Nura Al-Izzedin explores how events unfolded following the attacks in Vienna, which exposed serious government failings and led to a major crackdowns on Muslims in Austria.


On the 2nd of November 2020, Austria experienced an entirely preventable attack. Austria’s Minister for the Interior Karl Nehammer, who oversees the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution and Combating Terrorism (BVT), reported that a gunman who killed four people in Vienna, had tried to illegally purchase ammunition from Slovakia back in July.

This had been reported to the Austrian intelligence Services shortly after the attempt[1]. It was then revealed that it was not only foreign intelligence services who warned Austrian authorities about the perpetrator. The Austrian army intelligence services (Heeresnachrichtenamt), who had been responsible for monitoring the attacker’s probation, reported the perpetrator to Nehammer, after the perpetrator had been trying to illegally purchase ammunition[2].

Despite all of this, the most important fact to highlight is that the attack of November 2nd 2020 could have been entirely prevented within the framework of existing laws.

In response to this revelation, Austrians have called for the resignation of Nehammer.  The right-wing politician has remained silent on the issue. Yet a further investigation into Nehammer’s failings might prove useful in determining his reasons for withholding the information that could have prevented such a horrific attack.

Austria’s Anti-Terror Package

One week after the attack on November 2nd 2020, Austrian Chancellor, Sebastian Kurz tabled a new and highly controversial “anti-terror package[3]” which was further revised on December 16th.


Key measures of the package include[4]:

    • The process of shutting down associations or mosques deemed to play a role in “radicalisation” will be made easier. Likewise, the public will be able to report potential violent activities on an online platform.
    • The possibility to strip Austrians of their citizenship after being convicted of terrorist offences.
    • Introducing the criminal offence of “religiously motivated extremism”, which was initially meant to target “political Islam”1.
      Integration Minister Susanne Raab of the Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP), stated clearly that the criminal offence of “religiously motivated extremism” is a “central component in combating political Islam”[5].


    • A central register of imams will similarly be created. Raab stressed that “we want transparency in Austria as to who preaches in which mosque”[6].
    • Creating a register of threatening/dangerous individuals,  with the aim of preventing former convicted terrorists from working in critical infrastructure companies, hence barring them from any security-related tasks.
    • In some cases, people who have just been released from prison can be electronically monitored with an electronic ankle bracelet or wristband.



“At the moment there is only Islamism in Austria, which is specifically a religious extremist association” concluded Minister for Integration, Susanne Raab. She ignored the fact that just a few days before, police reported the largest weapon seizure in decades, intended to arm a right-wing militia.


Moreover, Amnesty International[7] views the announced measures as being serious encroachments on human rights and has called for an evaluation of existing instruments.

“At the moment there is only Islamism in Austria, which is specifically a religious extremist association”[8] and it is “specifically Islamism that poses the greatest danger”[9] concluded Minister for Integration, Susanne Raab.  Raab meanwhile ignored the fact that just a few days before her statement, police authorities uncovered an  
organised right-wing criminal network, seizing over 70 guns in a raid. The police reported that it had been the largest weapon seizure in decades, with the weapons being intended to arm a right-wing militia[10].


Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz ® with French President Emmanuel Macron (l) and Austrian President Alexander van der Bellen ©

Egyptian and Israeli missions in Austria and children rights violations: “Operation Luxor”

A week after the attack in Vienna, under the code name “Operation Luxor,” almost a thousand police officers stormed over 60 houses and apartments belonging to families and associations that are alleged to have links with the Austrian Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas[11]. To date, not one person has been arrested[12]. Nehammer, to whom the perpetrator of 2nd November attack was reported to beforehand, was personally present during the raids[13]. Prosecutors insisted that the raids were not connected to the 2nd November attack, but were the result of an investigation stretching back over more than a year.


It was the most elaborate operation in the history of Austria’s Ministry for Protection the Constitution, and, it is suspected by many that Austria’s judiciary and police have attempted 

to show their support for the Israeli and Egyptian authorities in their fight against the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, while also pursuing the agenda to silence outspoken Muslim activists.
Indeed, at no moment in the more than the year-long investigation, was any evidence uncovered surrounding a direct terrorist threat in Austria[14].

Key measures of the Anti-terror package include:

  •  Introducing the criminal offence of “religiously motivated extremism”
  • Shutting down associations or mosques deemed to play a role in “radicalisation” will be made easier.
  • A central register of imams will be created.
  •  The possibility to strip Austrians of their citizenship after being convicted of terrorist offences.
  • Creating a register of threatening/dangerous individuals, with the aim of barring convicts of terror offences from any security-related tasks.
  • Electronic monitoring for released prisoners.


To many, this raised suspicion as to what extent the house searches had been carried out in cooperation with Egyptian and Israeli secret services[15]. It is interesting to point out that the language and reasoning employed in the search warrants and indictments is almost identical to the language used by Egypt and Israel when describing the Muslim Brotherhood[16].  Yet a key difference is that the Muslim Brotherhood in Austria, unlike in Egypt, Syria and Saudi Arabia, is not considered as a terrorist organisation.

What is even more concerning are the reports of excessive force employed by Austrian authorities, even against children during the “Operation Luxor” raids. The excessive use of force and violence by the police authorities was such that, according to a child psychologist’s report, the raids have had a profound psychological impact on children. Other children’s reports include instances of masked police standing in front of a child’s bed and shouting “target person spotted”.

Over 30 children between the ages of eight months and eighteen were affected by the raids.  For those unaffected, the newfound pandemic life seems to continue as normal, all within the most livable city in the world, Vienna.
Reply
#72
WHETHER IT IS IN THE EAST OR WEST AS WELL AS NORTH  OR SOUTH ISLAMOPHOBIA NEEDS TO BE EXPOSED. EVEN ALTHOUGH CHINA IS WOOING AND DEPENDENT ON MUSLIM COUNTRIES LIKE PAKISTAN, IRAN AND TURKEY. IT'S POLICIES AND PRACTICES IN XINJIANG MUST NOT BE IGNORED AS THERE IS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO STATE THAT THERE HAS BEEN AND IS SYSTEMATIC PERSECUTION AND HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION OF THE UYGHUR MUSLIMS. 

IN THE VIDEO BELOW WHAT IS DISTURBING AND OBNOXIOUS IS HOW MAJOR CHINESE TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES HAVE BEEN EXPERIMENTING ON THE UYGHUR MUSLIMS WITH THE MOST EXTENSIVE SURVEILLANCE STATE CONTROL IN THE WORLD. ALSO AFTER PERFECTING THIS TECHNOLOGY IT IS EXPORTED GLOBALLY.

IF THIS IS IS HOW CHINESE STATE CAPITALISM OPERATES IT NEEDS TO BE BLACKLISTED AND SANCTIONS IMPOSED  ON ALL THE COMPANIES INVOLVED IN THIS HITECH EMPIRE. CHINA NEEDS TO BE WARNED THAT IT CAN NOT TAKE THE MUSLIM WORLD FOR GRANTED AND IT NEEDS TO END IT'S ISLAMOPHOBIA. ALSO THE HAN COLONISATION OF XINJIANG NEEDS TO END AND IT SHOULD BE ALLOWED IT'S AUTONOMY.  


CHINA UNDERCOVER 
PBS Documentary   FRONTLINE 





HOW XINJIANG BECAME MUSLIM 
LET's TALK RELIGION 
Reply
#73
AN ISSUE THAT I HAD THE PRIVILEGE TO CAMPAIGN AGAINST AT THE START OF MY CAREER IN THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA ALBEIT IN THE UK  HAS ARISEN IT'S HEAD AGAIN. THIS TIME IT ORIGINATES IN FRANCE. A HUGE BLOWBACK AND STORM HAS IGNITED IN PAKISTAN OVER THE FRENCH STATE'S SUPPORT OF BLASPHEMING AGAINST THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD'S DIGNITY. THE TLP BROUGHT THE COUNTRY TO A STANDSTILL OVER THE ARREST OVER THEIR LEADER.  THIS COULD LEAD TO NOT ONLY STRIFE BUT A CIVIL WAR AND IT'S EXPLOITATION BY ENEMIES OF PAKISTAN.  PAKISTAN AND PAKISTANIS MUST ENGAGE IN INTRA DIALOGUE AND REACH CONSENSUS ON THE MESSAGE THAT THE FRENCH AND THE WEST MUST BE GIVEN. 

THE COMMON MESSAGE WHICH SHOULD BE GIVEN FROM AN UNITED GLOBAL MUSLIM PLATFORM TO FRANCE AND THE WEST IN PARTICULAR. IS THAT BLASPHEMY AGAINST THE PROPHET IS NOT A RIGHT AND FREEDOM AND NEEDS TO BE OUTLAWED LIKE HOLOCAUST DENIAL DEMANDED BY WORLD JEWRY.  BECAUSE IT INSULTS MUSLIM SANCTITIES AND HURTS MUSLIMS DEEPLY BECAUSE MUHAMMMAD IS SOMEONE MUSLIMS RESPECT AND LOVE. THIS ISSUE HAS BECOME CENTRAL TO ISLAMOPHOBIA IN THE WEST AND SHOULD BE SEEN AS PART AND PARCEL OF THE RISE OF ISLAMOPHOBIA. WESTERNERS NEED TO REALISE THAT MUSLIMS ARE NOT AGAINST FREEDOM OF SPEECH BUT AGAINST THE ABUSE OF THIS RIGHT AND THINKING IT IS A LICENSE TO INSULT OTHERS SANCTITIES. JUST BECAUSE THE FRENCH AND EUROPEANS DON'T TAKE RELIGION SERIOUSLY DOES NOT ENTITLE THEM TO MOCK, ABUSE AND OFFEND OTHER RELIGIONS SANCTITIES. THIS IS NOT JUST ISLAMOPHOBIC BUT RACIST AND IMPERIALIST GIVEN THE HISTORICAL UNDERPINNINGS.

MUSLIMS AND ISLAM HAS NEVER TAUGHT DISRESPECTING OTHERS PROPHETS AND THERE SHOULD BE UNIVERSAL RECOGNITION THAT THIS IS A RED LINE THAT SHOULD NOT BE CROSSED IF WE WANT ANY SEMBLANCE OF A PEACEFUL MULTIFAITH AND MULTICULTURAL WORLD.  
  

IF THEY DON'T GET THIS MESSAGE IT NEEDS TO BE UNDERLINED BY BOYCOTTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF THE OFFENDING NATION. EITHER NATION(S) RESPECT EACH OTHER OTHERWISE THERE WILL BE A CANYON OF THE DEAF DUMB AND BLIND IN A GLOBAL VILLAGE.      


COMPLETE ADDRESS OF IMRAN KHAN TO THE NATION ABOUT FRANCE AMBASSADOR 



PRIME MINISTER IMRAN KHAN ADDRESS TO THE NATION ON TLP ISSUE  19 April 2021
Reply
#74
THE ISLAMOPHOBIA INDUSTRY IN THE ANGLOSPHERE NEEDS TO BE UNRAVELLED AS IT IS DEEPLY ENTRENCHED AND INSIDIOUS. ENGLAND AND THE UK HAS HAD CENTURIES OF INTERACTION WITH THE MUSLIM WORLD BOTH GOOD AND BAD. HOWEVER, IN TERMS OF CONTEMPORARY ISLAMOPHOBIA THE ROLE OF THE ENGLISH MEDIUM PRESS, MEDIA, POLITICIANS AND THINK TANKS NEEDS TO BE UNVEILED AND NEUTRALISED. 

AS THEY HAVE BEEN RESPONSIBLE FOR BUILDING UP A TOXIC AND PHONEY IMAGE OF MUSLIMS ASSOCIATION  WITH RADICALISM AND EXTREMISM FEEDING ISLAMIC TERRORISM WHICH IS AN OXYMORON. THIS HAS FUELLED LEGITIMISATION OF THE STATE'S SO CALLED COUNTER TERRORIST POLICIES AGAINST THE MUSLIM COMMUNITIES. 

THIS WHOLE NEFARIOUS NEXUS AND INDUSTRY NEEDS TO BE DISMANTLED AND FOCUS SHOULD BE ON DECONTRUCTING FALSE FLAG TERRORISM AND THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR IT 

     
THE QUILLIAM FOUNDATION HAS CLOSED BUT ITS
TOXIC LEGACY REMAINS

For 13 years, the organisation promoted policies that were harmful to the British Muslim community
https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2021/...cy-remains
Malia Bouattia


Pannelists T.J. Leyden, Usama Hasan, Melvyn Haward Jr., Maajid Nawaz, Susan Cruz, Paul Carrillo and moderator Jared Cohen speak at the Youth Radicalization Redefined during the 2011 Tribeca Film Festival at SVA Theater on April 29, 2011 in New York City [File: Jason Kempin/Getty Images/AFP]

The news that the Quilliam Foundation, a so-called counter-extremism think-tank, has closed, was welcomed by many – particularly by Muslims who have long been targets of the harmful practices of the organisation. On April 9, one of its founders, Maajid Nawaz, announced on Twitter that the decision was made due to the “hardship of maintaining a non-profit during Covid lockdowns”.
Although the foundation had experienced financial difficulties over the past few years, there has been some speculation that Nawaz’s flirtations with Q-Anon conspiracy theories about the US elections and the electoral defeat of Donald Trump may have contributed to internal splits and the decision to close down.

Despite the relief many of us feel, the foundation leaves behind a toxic legacy, which will continue to harm the Muslim community in the United Kingdom and beyond. The organisation was founded in 2008 by self-proclaimed ex-extremists and former members of the reactionary organisation Hizb ut-Tahirir (HT), Nawaz and Ed Husain. Named after Abdullah Quilliam, it received funding from the Home Office and purported to combat radicalisation in the wake of the 7/7 attacks in London. Instead, for 13 years Quilliam reinforced the idea that Muslims are a suspect community and supported the draconian “counter-terrorism” policies being pushed by the government. Its members peddled the unevidenced logic that to fight terrorism, the state had to identify and undermine extremist ideologies, which would lead to terrorist actions.

This logic gave birth to the British government’s obsession with so-called “non-violent extremism”. This conveyor belt theory became the bedrock of anti-radicalisation policies and served to normalise the criminalisation of thought rather than actions, and therefore the targeting of individuals who had not committed any crimes but were imagined to be at risk of committing unlawful acts in the future.

In the time that Quilliam was active, the counter-extremism apparatus in the UK grew more aggressive and pervasive by infiltrating every area of public and even private life, with public sector workers being drafted in to help spot these ill-defined signs of radicalisation. This process was cheered on energetically by the foundation.
In addition, it stoked up considerable hate towards Muslims and racialised communities in Britain. For example, when following the child sexual exploitation scandal in Rochdale and other cities, Quilliam published a report claiming that 84 percent of “grooming gang offenders” were Asian. This was later debunked by the Home Office’s own report that confirmed research has found that group-based offenders “are most commonly White”.
Unfortunately, much of the damage had already been done. As Dr Ella Cockbain, a researcher on child exploitation, pointed out in her criticism of the report by Quilliam, “the more ‘grooming gangs’ are seen as a Muslim problem, the more a ‘counter-extremism’ think-tank stands to gain.”

Quilliam was not only confident in making statements and publishing “findings”  which were not backed up by data, but it was also ruthless in making sure it held the attention of the government and international arena when it came to Muslims and counter-extremism. The foundation, in assuming the role of protectors of democracy, attempted to tarnish a whole spectrum of Muslim groups and collectives as being aligned with terrorist ideology. In fact, it supplied the Home Office with a “blacklist” which included the Islam TV channel, Muslim Safety Forum and the Islamic Human Rights Commission.

As a result of these activities, the reputation of the foundation within Muslim communities was quite low; many approached its work with distrust. Had its members sought to undertake de-radicalisation work among British Muslims, it is highly doubtful that they would have gotten anywhere. This, however, was clearly never the intention.
Quilliam’s PR stunt with English Defence League (EDL) founder, Tommy Robinson, is one striking example of how little its members cared about or considered Muslims. In 2013, the foundation announced that it had worked with the far-right leader to help him leave the EDL and his anti-Muslim activism; it even held a high-profile official press conference on the occasion. 
Robinson, who had spent years mobilising people against Muslim communities, targeting their mosques, and using them as scapegoats for every imaginable social, political and economic problem, announced he would start working with Quilliam.  Just two years later, however, he established the UK branch of the German anti-Muslim, anti-migrant far-right group, PEGIDA.

This was not the only deeply problematic association Quilliam had. Among its funders, there were quite a few Islamophobic entities and figures. In 2012, for example, the foundation received $75,000 from the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, which often funds so-called counter-jihad organisations including the anti-Muslim hate group the David Horowitz Freedom Centre. 
It also won a grant of over $1,000,000 from the John Templeton Foundation, a conservative organisation with links to the Tea Party in the US and reactionary Christian groups. Its former head, Jack Templeton, had funded groups opposing same-sex marriage and defending the war in Iraq. Another of Quilliam’s donors was “New Atheist” figure Sam Harris, who supports the use of torture and has encouraged the profiling of Muslims in his call for a “war with Islam”.

While Quilliam’s deplorable work towards the institutionalisation of Islamophobia and the destruction of civil liberties may be over, the damage that it has done will continue to be felt. It is enshrined in our counter-extremism policies, in the rhetoric of our politicians, and the far-right thugs that they have empowered as well as legitimised through their work.


As Dr Rizwaan Sabir, a lecturer in criminology who specialises in counter-terrorism at Liverpool John Moores University, told me recently, Quilliam’s impact “should not be taken lightly, since they, especially some key individuals from the organisation, had access to high-ranking policymakers, politicians, and civil servants and were therefore able to influence their ideas around security policy as well as the way they viewed Muslim organisations”.


Quilliam’s groundwork continues to bear fruit through state-led counter-extremism practices, like the Prevent programme, which profiles and criminalises Muslims. Threats to our civil liberties continue to worsen as the government pushes through more and more repressive policies, from the Coronavirus Act being extended, to the introduction of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill attempting to hinder our right to protest. All of this falls into the remit of state securitisation that was so strongly supported by Quilliam.


The work of normalising and pushing forward the government’s narrative has been done and it no longer requires Nawaz and his ilk to help in the process. In addition, there are still other neo-conservative think-tanks, like the Henry Jackson Society, which will carry forward their legacy.


Our focus must now be on completely dismantling the counter-extremism apparatus which continues to be used to erode our civil liberties, defending our freedoms and fighting Islamophobia. Quilliam faced years of opposition and critique from a broad coalition of trade unions, students, teachers, healthcare professionals, anti-racist activists and politicians who all opposed the Prevent strategy.

It is this broad network that must be reinforced and mobilised. As Islamophobic laws are passed with increasing speed across the continent, such mobilisation is urgently needed.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)